Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Researchers Show Vulnerabilities in Facial Recognition
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
JohnW891
50%
50%
JohnW891,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/12/2019 | 2:04:18 PM
There's More To This
Face recognition is a part of face biometrics that includes face authentication, a materially different approach. Recognition is based entirely on image matching. There is no liveness detection, the primary differentiator that allows an authentication system to both verify what the camera sees with what is on file *and* determine whether that "correct" person is actually alive at the time of the access request. But, not in that order.

Liveness detection (liveness.com) is key to actual authentication because is assess, literally, dozens of unique human attributes to determine that *together* they add up to a real human. If the liveness test isn't passed first, there is no need to match images. This prevents things like detailed masks, 4K video, etc. from standing in for the real person.

In addition, the data acquisition method for recognition is based on 2D images. In true authentication, 3D images provide far more signal to work with. This is why Face ID, even though it has no liveness detection, works better most of the time than the legacy algorithms that have powered recognition for, literally, decades. It has more to work with to make a more accurate match. But, as was seen (just look it up on YouTube), it's easy to spoof. And Apple will *never* subject it's tech to a transparent test, so we only have social proof to work with.

This is old news.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 11/19/2020
New Proposed DNS Security Features Released
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  11/19/2020
How to Identify Cobalt Strike on Your Network
Zohar Buber, Security Analyst,  11/18/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: He hits the gong anytime he sees someone click on an email link.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-29071
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
An XSS issue was found in the Shares feature of LiquidFiles before 3.3.19. The issue arises from the insecure rendering of HTML files uploaded to the platform as attachments, when the -htmlview URL is directly accessed. The impact ranges from executing commands as root on the server to retrieving se...
CVE-2020-29072
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
A Cross-Site Script Inclusion vulnerability was found on LiquidFiles before 3.3.19. This client-side attack requires user interaction (opening a link) and successful exploitation could lead to encrypted e-mail content leakage via messages/sent?format=js and popup?format=js.
CVE-2020-26241
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. This is a Consensus vulnerability in Geth before version 1.9.17 which can be used to cause a chain-split where vulnerable nodes reject the canonical chain. Geth's pre-compiled dataCopy (at 0x00...04) co...
CVE-2020-26242
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. In Geth before version 1.9.18, there is a Denial-of-service (crash) during block processing. This is fixed in 1.9.18.
CVE-2020-26240
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. An ethash mining DAG generation flaw in Geth before version 1.9.24 could cause miners to erroneously calculate PoW in an upcoming epoch (estimated early January, 2021). This happened on the ETC chain on...