Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2023-33196PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26Craft is a CMS for creating custom digital experiences. Cross site scripting (XSS) can be triggered by review volumes. This issue has been fixed in version 4.4.7.
CVE-2023-33185PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Django-SES is a drop-in mail backend for Django. The django_ses library implements a mail backend for Django using AWS Simple Email Service. The library exports the `SESEventWebhookView class` intended to receive signed requests from AWS to handle email bounces, subscriptions, etc. These requests ar...
CVE-2023-33187PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Highlight is an open source, full-stack monitoring platform. Highlight may record passwords on customer deployments when a password html input is switched to `type="text"` via a javascript "Show Password" button. This differs from the expected behavior which always obfuscates `ty...
CVE-2023-33194PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26
Craft is a CMS for creating custom digital experiences on the web.The platform does not filter input and encode output in Quick Post validation error message, which can deliver an XSS payload. Old CVE fixed the XSS in label HTML but didn’t fix it when clicking save. This issue was...
CVE-2023-2879PUBLISHED: 2023-05-26GDSDB infinite loop in Wireshark 4.0.0 to 4.0.5 and 3.6.0 to 3.6.13 allows denial of service via packet injection or crafted capture file
User Rank: Ninja
7/31/2019 | 8:53:37 AM
And yes, the system is an overseas system but even with that said, they still have the same problems as those of us in the US (ask Capital One, ex. employee). But there really needs to be an oversight group that constantly monitors the systems on a monthly basis (dependent on the level of priority and risk).
Interesting, databases replicate with one another so if someone from Thailand flies to Malaysia or Singapore, then they should be able to access their data from anywhere. This is referred to as Transactional or Mirrored replication (dependent upon the distance the data replicates from an to, ACID based transactions but it also depends on the type of DB as well).
So this tells me, the hacker did not have enough time to do research, the data is segmented based on zones (n + 1) or the information they gave is incorrect and/or the actor was able to move horizontally to extract information using known tools in their arsenal without being detected.
The red-team from China could have done this because of their attention to detail (they clean up everything) or APT teams from Russia could have done this as well (I am not leaving out North Korea because this is practiced on a regular).
It sounds to me that this was an inside job but the case is still under investigation.
T