Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Ransomware Hits Georgia Court System
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
7/6/2019 | 2:26:15 PM
Georgia security recommendations
Per the article, it was stated that GA is spending millions of dollars in resolving this issue with Ransomware. So how is it that the GA court got hit again (no lessons learned from March) and they had to still fork over money to address a similar issue? Is it me or has the security staff become extremely lax or individuals from the office have forgotten aspects of their training?

Timeline:


In March, ransomware hit the court system in rural Jackson County Georgia, between Atlanta and Athens. Jackson County paid attackers $400,000. And throughout June, three Florida municipalities—Key Biscayne, Lake City, and Riviera Beach—were hit with ransomware. Lake City paid 42 bitcoin (almost $500,000) to attackers, and Riviera Beach paid 65 bitcoin (almost $600,000).


Ok, so it seems the solutions we are putting place are not working, there needs to be a radical change in how we address this issue. If the person is click on the link, shouldn't there be adequate precautions, examples as follows:
  • Segment the network where web-traffic goes to a DMZ (proxied and filtered), two diferent types of FW, utilize the firewall on the servers "iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp -m multiport --dport 22,80,443 -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -j ACCEPT" and drop packets from china or Russia using iptables (shell script can help with this process)
    for i in `cat china.txt`; do iptables -A INPUT -s $i -j DROP; done
    python -c "import os; file = open('chinaip.txt', 'r'); for i in file: os.system('iptables -A INPUT -s i -j DROP'); print(f'Entry succeeded: ' $?)
  • If web traffic comes through, put it on IPv6 traffic, put the network on a different type of protocol all together (internally)
  • If the data is stored on a segmented network, remove SMB/CIFS from the "Zone 0" data. The filesystem should not have a way of encrpting the data at all, the module for encrption should be removed (put this on Linux or Z/OS), even if there is a payload, the AV should catch this because the application or user is not an approved user from an SELinux standpoint.
  • Employ SELinux (MIT's file, process, filesystem, domain application used for controlling the type of execution, if it comes from the web, then the data that comes in in a folder should be setup using "setsebool -P use_encryptfs_home_dirs off" and "semanage fcontext -a -t use_encryptfs_home_dirs "/home/<username>(/.*)?" and finally run ls -lZ /home/<username> to disable encryption on the home dirs.

Todd


News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27670
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Appspace 6.2.4 allows SSRF via the api/v1/core/proxy/jsonprequest url parameter.
CVE-2021-27671
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
An issue was discovered in the comrak crate before 0.9.1 for Rust. XSS can occur because the protection mechanism for data: and javascript: URIs is case-sensitive, allowing (for example) Data: to be used in an attack.
CVE-2020-9051
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-9052
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-9053
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none.