Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Raspberry Pi Used in JPL Breach
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
6/27/2019 | 9:16:06 PM
Identified and found numerous security vulnerabilities
We also found that security problem log tickets, created in the ITSDB when a potential or actual IT system security vulnerability is identified, were not resolved for extended periods of time—sometimes longer than 180 days.
However, we found the database inventory incomplete and inaccurate, placing at risk JPL's ability to effectively monitor, report, and respond to security incidents.
Further, we found that JPL's network gateway that controls partner access to a shared IT environment for specific missions and data had not been properly segmented to limit users only to those systems and applications for which they had approved access.
PL had not implemented a threat hunting program recommended by IT security experts to aggressively pursue abnormal activity on its systems for signs of compromise, and instead rely on an ad hoc process to search for intruders.
We found that multiple JPL incident management and response practices deviate from NASA and recommended industry practices.For example, unlike NASA's Security Operations Center (SOC), JPL's SOC does not maintain round-the-clock availability of IT security incident responders and JPL's incident response plan does not include all federally-recommended elements.
In addition, team coordination issues delayed completion of incident containment and eradication steps for the April 2018 incident.
No controls were in place to ensure JPL compliance with this requirement nor did NASA officials have access to JPL's incident management system.
As of March 2019, the Agency had not approved JPL's plans to implement new IT security policies and requirements NASA included in its October 2018 contract.

From looking at the report, the JPL Raspberry PI was just one item that was a major issue, I think where I am confused is how did a device from the public get on the network of NASA's Jet Propulsion system's network? There should have been some sort of notification that looked up MAC addresses that were purchased or perform a reg-ex lookup of mac addresses that are not on the production network's device purchase list.
MAC Address/OUIVendor
B8:27:EB Raspberry Pi Foundation
Cisco Network - show mac address-table | in b8:27:eb
show ip arp vlan <vlan no> | include b827.eb

This is from NASA's final security report - https://oig.nasa.gov/docs/IG-19-022.pdf. They stated this occurred over the last 10 years. I am not sure about the rest of the group but the contract, employees and the rest of the security department should all be fired from this point (start from the top, remove everyone and start again).

This is what I mean by incompentence at the highest level.

Todd S


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Improving Enterprise Cybersecurity With XDR
Enterprises are looking at eXtended Detection and Response technologies to improve their abilities to detect, and respond to, threats. While endpoint detection and response is not new to enterprise security, organizations have to improve network visibility, expand data collection and expand threat hunting capabilites if they want their XDR deployments to succeed. This issue of Tech Insights also includes: a market overview for XDR from Omdia, questions to ask before deploying XDR, and an XDR primer.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-2339
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-07
With this SSRF vulnerability, an attacker can reach internal addresses to make a request as the server and read it's contents. This attack can lead to leak of sensitive information.
CVE-2022-20752
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-06
A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM), Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME), and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a timing attack. This vulnerability is due to insufficient pro...
CVE-2022-20768
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-06
A vulnerability in the logging component of Cisco TelePresence Collaboration Endpoint (CE) and RoomOS Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive information in clear text on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to the storage of certain unencrypted credentials....
CVE-2022-20791
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-06
A vulnerability in the database user privileges of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM), Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME), and Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM &amp;amp; Presence Service (Unified CM IM&amp;amp;P) could allow an auth...
CVE-2022-20800
PUBLISHED: 2022-07-06
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM), Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME), Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM &amp;amp; Presence Service (Unified CM IM&amp;amp;P), and Cisco Unity ...