Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Can Your Patching Strategy Keep Up with the Demands of Open Source?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
timintech
50%
50%
timintech,
User Rank: Author
6/19/2019 | 10:05:28 AM
Re: On Open Source, Freeware and other slithy toves
My core point being that open source components are likely throughout your environment, not just in a test area. That's in large part due to the types of problems solved. So, if you look closely at any firmware, you'll likely see open source components in there. The same goes for virtualization and containerization software or public cloud infrastructure. Even Microsoft is a huge supporter of open source with over 2500 projects published on GitHub and .Net Core available under an MIT license.

Net of this, you're absolutely right that a risk reward tradeoff is required – it's just that with the ubiquity of open source usage in commercial applications, you're going to want to ensure you know what's being used or embedded regardless of where it originated.
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
6/19/2019 | 8:40:28 AM
Re: On Open Source, Freeware and other slithy toves
i neglected to comment that some open source or shareware can be VERY VERY useful, performing short-cut work that off the shelf applications do not and, by that virtue, are beloved.  That said, IT professionals then have to weigh the risk-reward equation on this product.  Is it worth the ease of task vs. ease of infection and lack or difficulty of patching resources.   There is also the severity of platform mount - is the software on a non-important system or a critical host server.  Some of it is just grand for programming.  Single workstation, ok, a threat point but not a server.  So it is a balance act between threat and gain. 
timintech
50%
50%
timintech,
User Rank: Author
6/18/2019 | 3:31:35 PM
Re: On Open Source, Freeware and other slithy toves
The most interesting thing we see when auditing an application is how strongly some teams hold on to the perception there is no, or at best limited, use of open source technologies in their applications or environments. The reality is that open source is part of most modern applications – be it in the app itself or how its deployed. Not knowing what you've got is the easiest way to get blind-sided. That's why the patch management strategy is so crucial, and if you'd prefer a patch Tuesday type model, there are many vendors out there who'll happily provide that type of service for a license/support fee. Just be careful to get that complete inventory so you can ensure full compliance from all vendors - otherwise that 50s Olds experience could be the result!

 
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
6/18/2019 | 2:31:15 PM
On Open Source, Freeware and other slithy toves
I have liked shareware ages ago because it was fun and generally free.  These days it is also wide open available and as an open door product, I have never considered for use in a corporate environment.  Rather like having an old 1950's Oldsmobile in the back yard - easy to break into.  It just is a risk by itself and patching is the next nightmare, point of this article.  Indeed you have to devote some resource and time to patching - no Patch tuesday here.  It just never struck me in the right vein and, today, I have none of it at all.   


Firms Improve Threat Detection but Face Increasingly Disruptive Attacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/20/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-19668
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-17963. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-17963. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-17963 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to preve...
CVE-2019-12882
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2017-6363
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** DISPUTED ** In the GD Graphics Library (aka LibGD) through 2.2.5, there is a heap-based buffer over-read in tiffWriter in gd_tiff.c. NOTE: the vendor says "In my opinion this issue should not have a CVE, since the GD and GD2 formats are documented to be 'obsolete, and should only be used for...
CVE-2017-6371
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
Synchronet BBS 3.16c for Windows allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service crash) via a long string in the HTTP Referer header.
CVE-2017-5861
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-1000020. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-1000020. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-1000020 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...