Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Checkers Breach Underscores Continued POS Dangers
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
RetiredUser
100%
0%
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
6/1/2019 | 3:07:35 PM
Protection Profiles for PoS
In a 2014 paper on PoS protection profiles [1] the authors point to the failure of PoS companies in general to comply to any given standard (including, I assume, the EMV) or, despite trying to comply, still end up getting hacked.  There is no guarantee of security when an organization uses a standard such as EMV; failure points exist across the PoS ecosystem, not just at a single point.  The paper focuses instead on a protection profile for PoS based on Common Criteria (CC) with the goal of developing security functional requirements for PoS systems that are more robust, more likely to produce a secure PoS system and are not limited to a specific country's standard for security, but drawn from an international standard (ISO/IEC 15408).  While many standards from each country who have written them for PoS security reference or draw from CC, the importance of having mandatory security functional requirements based on the CC (ISO/IEC 15408) that are NOT rooted in any one country's interpretation or implementation is critical to higher levels of PoS security globally.  As the paper concludes, this aids in making the most objective evaluation of the security of a PoS system possible.   

[1] Lee HJ., Lee Y., Won D. (2014) Protection Profile for PoS (Point of Sale) System. In: Park J., Adeli H., Park N., Woungang I. (eds) Mobile, Ubiquitous, and Intelligent Computing. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 274. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
6/3/2019 | 2:05:03 PM
Re: Protection Profiles for PoS
Less technical notes - many POS devices years ago had an XP version called 'Embedded" - never had a chance to work on one of these different systems but I wonder who was in control - who supported them?  I presume the retail store itself or parent firm has a support conract and how often, and this is frightening, do their staff visit a retail store for upgrades and review.  Never knew.  Kroger has POS stations of course and about 2 yeas ago they were upgraded from (god forbid) Windows NT ----- true, I recongized the OS screen easy ---- to Windows 7 and that was a nightmare for 2 weeks.  Again - WHO supports these devices.  And Every Kroger has four of them.  I have seen in Atlanta internet attached parking meters!!!   True - debit card, swipe and there you go.  


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/17/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5421
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
In Spring Framework versions 5.2.0 - 5.2.8, 5.1.0 - 5.1.17, 5.0.0 - 5.0.18, 4.3.0 - 4.3.28, and older unsupported versions, the protections against RFD attacks from CVE-2015-5211 may be bypassed depending on the browser used through the use of a jsessionid path parameter.
CVE-2020-8225
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
A cleartext storage of sensitive information in Nextcloud Desktop Client 2.6.4 gave away information about used proxies and their authentication credentials.
CVE-2020-8237
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Prototype pollution in json-bigint npm package < 1.0.0 may lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack.
CVE-2020-8245
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Improper Input Validation on Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-64.35, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before 12.1-58.15, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.187, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.0, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 11.1 before 11.1-65.12, Citrix SD-WAN WANOP 11....
CVE-2020-8246
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-64.35, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before 12.1-58.15, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.187, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.0, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 11.1 before 11.1-65.12, Citrix SD-WAN WANOP 11.2 before 11.2.1a, Citrix SD-W...