Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RetiredUser
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
5/22/2019 | 3:33:47 AM
Re: Clarification-No Breach
Personally I consider at the lowest level unauthorized access a "breach" but you're right that in this case, what we typically call a breach - exposure of data, infestation - doesn't seem to have occurred.  Perhaps the breach spin is good, however, as it raises awareness of a weak network and security policy that likely encouraged a quick change in security processes by TeamViewer.  It also raises awareness - in security there is no "old news" as some readers may mistake this to be; any company that may have trojans or other compromising code hidden in its products needs to step up and convince us otherwise.  The question here is have they convinced us?  
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/21/2019 | 2:17:06 PM
Clarification-No Breach
From the Read More: " found no evidence that customer data or other sensitive information had been stolen".... As such it would be a security incident and not a breach. Still alarming but not as detrimental to brand reputation based on how the company dealt with that incident. 
REISEN1955
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
5/21/2019 | 1:25:11 PM
Suspect indeed
For the past two years, our department has waged a campaign against Teamviewer because it was judged in-secure and now this article verifies our actions.  Remove it from all endpoints and systems. 


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Incorporating a Prevention Mindset into Threat Detection and Response
Threat detection and response systems, by definition, are reactive because they have to wait for damage to be done before finding the attack. With a prevention-mindset, security teams can proactively anticipate the attacker's next move, rather than reacting to specific threats or trying to detect the latest techniques in real-time. The report covers areas enterprises should focus on: What positive response looks like. Improving security hygiene. Combining preventive actions with red team efforts.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-25878
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-27
The package protobufjs before 6.11.3 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution which can allow an attacker to add/modify properties of the Object.prototype. This vulnerability can occur in multiple ways: 1. by providing untrusted user input to util.setProperty or to ReflectionObject.setParsedOption ...
CVE-2021-27780
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-27
The software may be vulnerable to both Un-Auth XML interaction and unauthenticated device enrollment.
CVE-2021-27781
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-27
The Master operator may be able to embed script tag in HTML with alert pop-up display cookie.
CVE-2022-1897
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-27
Out-of-bounds Write in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.
CVE-2022-20666
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-27
Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Common Services Platform Collector (CSPC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient va...