Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Security Doesn't Trust IT and IT Doesn't Trust Security
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
BradleyRoss
50%
50%
BradleyRoss,
User Rank: Moderator
5/9/2019 | 5:17:45 PM
Not trusting
The meetings I attended involved ten or twelve people with every person saying that they were in charge.  The next statement was usually that whatever went wrong, it was somebody else's fault.

In several cases, Security set requirements that were expensive and useless, but then said that it was up to IT to find the funding for the changes.  If Security wants to set policy, it has to do a number of things

Set clear policies and enforce them on everybody, including the C-Suite and themselves

If Security wants to set policies, it has to justify the required expenditure and be honest about the expenditures.  If they can't justify the expenses to the top executives, how is IT going to do it.  If Security has to make themselves unpopular, that is their job.

Be willing to justify their requirements, listen to the users, and be willing to admit when they are wrong.

Recognize that there are many people in IT who actually are far more knowledgable about computer security than they are.  I shouldn't have to explain customer requirements on security to the security staff.  I had a person in Security who told me that he didn't understand a government document.  I went through it, and found a list of referenced documents in the first few pages that contained glossaries and background information.  His response was that nobody had told him to read the other document which contained background material and a glossary.  I repeated that the preface stated that you had to go by the other document.  He said that he didn't care what the preface said, he was only told to follow the rest of the document.

Don't tell people that they are just too stupid to understand how brilliant they are.  I've actually encountered that.

When you receive a letter from the customer stating that you used to have the best and the brightest, but they were replaced by people who were far less competent than those that they replaced but believed themselves to be far more competent, don't state that you don't understand what they are trying to say.

If you really want to impress people, make sure that you specify the character encoding on your web pages.  The little black diamonds with question marks inside don't help your credibility.  If you don't specify it, your browser will probably use either UTF-8 or ISO-8850-1 according to how the browser is set up, but that won't necessarily match what was used in the page.  If you don't know what I'm talking about,don't pass yourself off as a computer expert.

Finally, you have to realize that people who worry about losing control never had it in the first place and never will.
BradleyRoss
50%
50%
BradleyRoss,
User Rank: Moderator
5/9/2019 | 5:17:44 PM
Not trusting
The meetings I attended involved ten or twelve people with every person saying that they were in charge.  The next statement was usually that whatever went wrong, it was somebody else's fault.

In several cases, Security set requirements that were expensive and useless, but then said that it was up to IT to find the funding for the changes.  If Security wants to set policy, it has to do a number of things

Set clear policies and enforce them on everybody, including the C-Suite and themselves

If Security wants to set policies, it has to justify the required expenditure and be honest about the expenditures.  If they can't justify the expenses to the top executives, how is IT going to do it.  If Security has to make themselves unpopular, that is their job.

Be willing to justify their requirements, listen to the users, and be willing to admit when they are wrong.

Recognize that there are many people in IT who actually are far more knowledgable about computer security than they are.  I shouldn't have to explain customer requirements on security to the security staff.  I had a person in Security who told me that he didn't understand a government document.  I went through it, and found a list of referenced documents in the first few pages that contained glossaries and background information.  His response was that nobody had told him to read the other document which contained background material and a glossary.  I repeated that the preface stated that you had to go by the other document.  He said that he didn't care what the preface said, he was only told to follow the rest of the document.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
9 Tips to Prepare for the Future of Cloud & Network Security
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  9/28/2020
Attacker Dwell Time: Ransomware's Most Important Metric
Ricardo Villadiego, Founder and CEO of Lumu,  9/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25288
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
An issue was discovered in MantisBT before 2.24.3. When editing an Issue in a Project where a Custom Field with a crafted Regular Expression property is used, improper escaping of the corresponding form input's pattern attribute allows HTML injection and, if CSP settings permit, execution of arbitra...
CVE-2020-25781
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
An issue was discovered in file_download.php in MantisBT before 2.24.3. Users without access to view private issue notes are able to download the (supposedly private) attachments linked to these notes by accessing the corresponding file download URL directly.
CVE-2020-25830
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
An issue was discovered in MantisBT before 2.24.3. Improper escaping of a custom field's name allows an attacker to inject HTML and, if CSP settings permit, achieve execution of arbitrary JavaScript when attempting to update said custom field via bug_actiongroup_page.php.
CVE-2020-26159
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
In Oniguruma 6.9.5_rev1, an attacker able to supply a regular expression for compilation may be able to overflow a buffer by one byte in concat_opt_exact_str in src/regcomp.c .
CVE-2020-6654
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-30
A DLL Hijacking vulnerability in Eaton's 9000x Programming and Configuration Software v 2.0.38 and prior allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code by replacing the required DLLs with malicious DLLs when the software try to load vci11un6.DLL and cinpl.DLL.