Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
55% of SMBs Would Pay Up Post-Ransomware Attack
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
4/25/2019 | 3:36:26 PM
Unbelieveable
Proof positive that small business IT lacks the brains to come up with a good disaster recovery plan.  What if a server itself crashes --- then all data is "encrypted" really good on a dead drive or system.  So WHO would you pay to restore that?  I saved a museum I supported by HAVING a good plan and using it so that within 3 hours 98% of everything was back.  I mean - COME ON, GET WITH THE PROGRAM.   There is way too much of this and everytime a ransomware story comes up---- PAY and that solves the issue  Incredible.  
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/26/2019 | 9:26:56 AM
Re: Unbelieveable
Agree. It's amazing how much headache you can forgo if you have a DR plan. It still amazes me that this solution has been evident for so long and still many are resistant to implement. It has more than just security benefits but data preservation benefits as you have pointed out. 

But I guess companies are still waiting to be burnt by the stove unfortunately.
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
4/26/2019 | 9:52:54 AM
Re: Unbelieveable
About 18 years ago on a lovely September morning, my data center crashed 103 floors along with the building and I was lucky to get down from the 101st floor. South tower.  So I am big into disaster recovery.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
4/28/2019 | 4:08:43 PM
Anternative?
Security experts typically advise against paying for stolen data after ransomware attacks, but 55% of executives at small to midsize businesses say they would do exactly that. That may be because they do not have an alternative?
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
4/28/2019 | 4:10:24 PM
Re: Unbelieveable
Proof positive that small business IT lacks the brains to come up with a good disaster recovery plan. This makes very good sense. If they do not have a backup to go then they loose data and that is a bigger problem.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
4/28/2019 | 4:12:47 PM
Re: Unbelieveable
I saved a museum I supported by HAVING a good plan and using it so that within 3 hours 98% of everything was back. That is good. Everybody needs a backup plant that goes against a ransomware attack. They should be able to go back as much past as needed.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
4/28/2019 | 4:14:32 PM
Re: Unbelieveable
t's amazing how much headache you can forgo if you have a DR plan. Sometime a DR plan may not save us. You should be able to get data back, historical data may be encrypted too.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
4/28/2019 | 4:16:44 PM
Re: Unbelieveable
But I guess companies are still waiting to be burnt by the stove unfortunately. This makes sense. I think it identifies the major problem we face. No action unless got hit.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-37742
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-30
app/View/Elements/GalaxyClusters/view_relation_tree.ctp in MISP 2.4.147 allows Stored XSS when viewing galaxy cluster relationships.
CVE-2021-37743
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-30
app/View/GalaxyElements/ajax/index.ctp in MISP 2.4.147 allows Stored XSS when viewing galaxy cluster elements in JSON format.
CVE-2021-37746
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-30
textview_uri_security_check in textview.c in Claws Mail before 3.18.0, and Sylpheed through 3.7.0, does not have sufficient link checks before accepting a click.
CVE-2020-26563
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-30
ObjectPlanet Opinio before 7.13 allows reflected XSS via the survey/admin/surveyAdmin.do?action=viewSurveyAdmin query string. (There is also stored XSS if input to survey/admin/*.do is accepted from untrusted users.)
CVE-2021-37606
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-30
Meow hash 0.5/calico does not sufficiently thwart key recovery by an attacker who can query whether there's a collision in the bottom bits of the hashes of two messages, as demonstrated by an attack against a long-running web service that allows the attacker to infer collisions by measuring timing d...