Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
When Your Sandbox Fails
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
ChadL196
50%
50%
ChadL196,
User Rank: Author
4/12/2019 | 12:55:18 PM
Sandbox evasion
Hi Kowsik,

Thanks for the read. Sandbox evasion is what we live and breathe. We've published our own work on that, and have dealt with the use cases you describe. Of course, some of it is dependant on the customer ensuring their analysis environment matches their own target environment. Hence we support gold images as analysis targets for ex. And tailoring of the localisation settings and VPN settings for outbound communication: https://www.vmray.com/cyber-security-blog/sandbox-evasion-techniques-part-1/
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
4/11/2019 | 12:36:34 PM
On Time
State sponsored actors and hackers have one huge advantage - time.  And the ability to think.  All they do is think about ways to hack and break into systems being as innovative as this article indicates.  New will always happen and they time on their hands to do more wrong, hence their attacks increase in sophistication.  We shall always be 5 minutes behind them at the least.  WE have daily chores, work and fighting infections among them while hunting down particulars of the infection real fast .... and they just have to think it up and release it.  No need to fight it for them.  They have the advantage, always have and always will. 

And again email delivery to user.  If you don't need it, don't read it, delete it.


Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19071
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-18
A memory leak in the rsi_send_beacon() function in drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_mgmt.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.11 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering rsi_prepare_beacon() failures, aka CID-d563131ef23c.
CVE-2019-19072
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-18
A memory leak in the predicate_parse() function in kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.11 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption), aka CID-96c5c6e6a5b6.
CVE-2019-19073
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-18
Memory leaks in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_hst.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.11 allow attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering wait_for_completion_timeout() failures. This affects the htc_config_pipe_credits() function, the htc_setup_complete() function, ...
CVE-2019-19074
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-18
A memory leak in the ath9k_wmi_cmd() function in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.11 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption), aka CID-728c1e2a05e4.
CVE-2019-19075
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-18
A memory leak in the ca8210_probe() function in drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c in the Linux kernel before 5.3.8 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering ca8210_get_platform_data() failures, aka CID-6402939ec86e.