Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
IoT Security's Coming of Age Is Overdue
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Saumitra Das
50%
50%
Saumitra Das,
User Rank: Author
4/26/2019 | 3:12:23 AM
Re: We need to improve, pronto
This is the nature of our industry where the bad guys have TIME as you mention but many are incredibly well funded as well. As you say, they need to find one hole while we have to patch or inspect all points of entry. In my past roles, I have seen targeted attacks where no threat intel would help since the payloads, domains, IPs were all new and custom. So every attack is "unknown" when you see it and so you sandbox and you are minutes to hours behind depending on how evasive the threat is. Having a different technique that can provide a low false positive verdict in near real time can help burdened SOC teams in prioritizing and going after threats before they have spread futher in and is one step we can make towards shifting this TIME imbalance.
Saumitra Das
50%
50%
Saumitra Das,
User Rank: Author
4/26/2019 | 3:07:17 AM
Re: We need to improve, pronto
I think there has been a lot of focus on compliance, auditing and visilibty as it related to security. We have given up on early detection at the point of intrusion and basically assumed breach and focused on hunting for post infection IOCs with NTA and SIEM. This exacerbates the problems for an overloaded SOC team already receiving tons of logs and alerts and struggling to deal with them given the cyber talent shortage. While hunting for threats assuming breach is a good layer to have, equal or more focus should be given to detecting as early as possible so the risk of breach is minimized and we only have to threat hunt for the very few that may be sophisticated enough to still make it through.
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
2/15/2019 | 7:05:56 AM
Re: We need to improve, pronto
The bad guys ( all of them ) have nothing but TIME on their hands - they have all day to just THINK about how to bypass any security function and this is an incredible advantage.  WE have to deal with trying to out-think them while dealing with a few thousand corporate rules, regulations, budget and time issues.  We have an 8-12 hour working day standard.  The bad guys have 24 hour days all of the time.  There we have a mega disadvantage in effort and, besides,   I always believe we are forever 5 minutes behind the the bad guys all of the time. 
StephenGiderson
50%
50%
StephenGiderson,
User Rank: Strategist
2/14/2019 | 9:35:31 PM
We need to improve, pronto
As technology evolves, so should security. However, in this rapidly progressing era, that unfortunately isn't the case. As we witness constant development of various technologies, we sadly also experience major lapses in security over various platforms. Consumer data is sacrificed affecting not only individuals but large corporations as well. Major loss of confidence has occurred over the course of just less than a decade and how can we seriously improve?
UdyRegan
50%
50%
UdyRegan,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/14/2019 | 2:01:46 AM
Many entry points..
The more connections you have to an information hub, the more security you're going to need. Every access point is a potential threat, of course. I'm pretty sure that you'll be able to find some good solutions to beef up the security of the data storage points though. That at least is one way to implement a bit of protection.
Saumitra Das
100%
0%
Saumitra Das,
User Rank: Author
2/4/2019 | 2:30:53 PM
Re: Blockchain
Blockchain for IoT is an interesting area for distributed trust between devices and the entities they interact with. However, security itself can be about the IoT device being tampered with in terms of transacting with other entities as well as being compromised itself leading to lateral movement in the enterprise. Additionally, many IoT systems are battery, CPU and network bandwidth constrained which can be challenging for deploying blockchain. Neural network based threat detection can help identify compromise early and has the potential to be a key enabler of this ecosystem.
blodgettcalvin
50%
50%
blodgettcalvin,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/4/2019 | 11:21:15 AM
Blockchain
In fact, there are already many protection technologies. The most popular is the blockchain system. Also, the development of neural networks makes itself felt and there will soon be a new system based on neural systems.


Firms Improve Threat Detection but Face Increasingly Disruptive Attacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/20/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-19668
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-17963. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-17963. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-17963 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to preve...
CVE-2019-12882
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2017-6363
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** DISPUTED ** In the GD Graphics Library (aka LibGD) through 2.2.5, there is a heap-based buffer over-read in tiffWriter in gd_tiff.c. NOTE: the vendor says "In my opinion this issue should not have a CVE, since the GD and GD2 formats are documented to be 'obsolete, and should only be used for...
CVE-2017-6371
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
Synchronet BBS 3.16c for Windows allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service crash) via a long string in the HTTP Referer header.
CVE-2017-5861
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-1000020. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-1000020. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-1000020 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...