Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Google Creates Online Phishing Quiz
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Elephant man
Elephant man,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/27/2019 | 3:49:06 PM
Last example is bad advice
The last example in the quiz states "you should click the applications link to ensure any additional information seems correct"....that is 100% WRONG - sorry google! Shame on you, that is awful...
ThomasMaloney
ThomasMaloney,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/14/2019 | 9:10:48 PM
It's not all that easy
I think we need a lot more than quizzes to educate people on what exactly and attack on their security systems is going to look like. Honestly at the rate that these emails and hacks are coming out you would think that people would know better, but there are still plenty of people who are swindled every day!
REISEN1955
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
2/11/2019 | 9:07:42 AM
Re: Great first step
I'll try two factor again on my account - worked well on web but Outlook hated it.
EdwardThirlwall
EdwardThirlwall,
User Rank: Moderator
2/11/2019 | 1:18:43 AM
Safety needs measures
Other platforms ought to learn a thing or two from the security experts so as to prevent data breaches in their firms as well. It usually starts small but a simple hack could cause an entire site to shut down for good. Following the footsteps of Google with their 2-factors authentication would mean a much more tedious step for users but at the end of the day, they would appreciate their confidential data being kept safe.
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
1/23/2019 | 4:00:06 PM
Great first step
I like the progress that Google is making to train users on potential nefarious actions. I'm going to take this myself and if it turns out to be effective I'm going to try and echo it through the security community.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Incorporating a Prevention Mindset into Threat Detection and Response
Threat detection and response systems, by definition, are reactive because they have to wait for damage to be done before finding the attack. With a prevention-mindset, security teams can proactively anticipate the attacker's next move, rather than reacting to specific threats or trying to detect the latest techniques in real-time. The report covers areas enterprises should focus on: What positive response looks like. Improving security hygiene. Combining preventive actions with red team efforts.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-1809
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21
Access of Uninitialized Pointer in GitHub repository radareorg/radare2 prior to 5.7.0.
CVE-2022-31267
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21
Gitblit 1.9.2 allows privilege escalation via the Config User Service: a control character can be placed in a profile data field, such as an emailAddress%3Atext '[email protected]\n\trole = "#admin"' value.
CVE-2022-31268
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21
A Path Traversal vulnerability in Gitblit 1.9.3 can lead to reading website files via /resources//../ (e.g., followed by a WEB-INF or META-INF pathname).
CVE-2022-31264
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21
Solana solana_rbpf before 0.2.29 has an addition integer overflow via invalid ELF program headers. elf.rs has a panic via a malformed eBPF program.
CVE-2022-31259
PUBLISHED: 2022-05-21
The route lookup process in beego through 1.12.4 and 2.x through 2.0.2 allows attackers to bypass access control. When a /p1/p2/:name route is configured, attackers can access it by appending .xml in various places (e.g., p1.xml instead of p1).