Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
How the US Chooses Which Zero-Day Vulnerabilities to Stockpile
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
MelBrandle
MelBrandle,
User Rank: Moderator
1/26/2019 | 2:33:26 AM
Selective disclosure
What I reckon is happening is that the government is keeping all these secrets in storage for fear that if the data got out, that the hackers would be able to replicate what's been going on. They would have to be very careful what  information to release if they're going to disclose any of it at all!
michaelmaloney
michaelmaloney,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/25/2019 | 2:27:16 AM
Staying neutral is best
I guess the I belong in the third group as well because every scenario would often come with its own pros and cons. It is not entirely up to us alone to weigh in on whether or not the vulnerabilities should indeed be kept in a secret storage or be let out in the open. Instead, we need to analyze on the given situation at that exact moment in time to see which solution suits best.
ConwayK9781
ConwayK9781,
User Rank: Strategist
1/17/2019 | 9:19:02 AM
Huh...
> "And then there's a third group, to which I belong. This crowd understands both the benefits and consequences that can occur when governments find and conceal vulnerabilities."
> implies only third group understand both
> proceeds to show that the third group clearly doesn't, as they support a government weaponizing zero-days at the expense of the citizens for its own personal gain




Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Machine Learning, AI & Deep Learning Improve Cybersecurity
Machine intelligence is influencing all aspects of cybersecurity. Organizations are implementing AI-based security to analyze event data using ML models that identify attack patterns and increase automation. Before security teams can take advantage of AI and ML tools, they need to know what is possible. This report covers: -How to assess the vendor's AI/ML claims -Defining success criteria for AI/ML implementations -Challenges when implementing AI
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-42002
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-01
SonicJS through 0.6.0 allows file overwrite. It has the following mutations that are used for updating files: fileCreate and fileUpdate. Both of these mutations can be called without any authentication to overwrite any files on a SonicJS application, leading to Arbitrary File Write and Delete.
CVE-2022-39268
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-30
### Impact In a CSRF attack, an innocent end user is tricked by an attacker into submitting a web request that they did not intend. This may cause actions to be performed on the website that can include inadvertent client or server data leakage, change of session state, or manipulation of an end use...
CVE-2022-34428
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-30
Dell Hybrid Client prior to version 1.8 contains a Regular Expression Denial of Service Vulnerability in the UI. An adversary with WMS group admin access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to temporary denial-of-service.
CVE-2022-34429
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-30
Dell Hybrid Client below 1.8 version contains a Zip Slip Vulnerability in UI. A guest privilege attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to system files modification.
CVE-2022-40923
PUBLISHED: 2022-09-30
A vulnerability in the LIEF::MachO::SegmentCommand::virtual_address function of LIEF v0.12.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (DOS) through a segmentation fault via a crafted MachO file.