Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Privacy Futures: Fed-up Consumers Take Their Data Back
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
lunny
0%
100%
lunny,
User Rank: Strategist
12/20/2018 | 12:10:07 PM
Make the Data Worthless
As more and more data is released through breaches, malicious attacks or simple mistakes, at some point it is all out there.  Once your name, social security number, birth date, place of birth, and other data has been released, there's no reeling it back in.  You can change your name perhaps, but the rest cannot be changed.  We spend a great deal of time and effort trying to protect this data.  We're running out of fingers to put in the dyke while more and more data continues to be released.  With advanced analytics and quantum computing emerging, the ability to accurately infer private data from existing public data will become a reality.

Our goal then, should be to make it harder to use this data to impersonate someone.  It is far too easy to pretend to be another person, by having pieces of key data, to steal money.  We all love the convenience of online commerce, but this problem is the price we pay.  Years ago (many years), I was in the military.  In order to pay with a check anywhere on base, my check had to have the following printed on it; my full name, my social security number (yes, that!), my address, my phone number, and my military unit designator.  But in the 1980s, it wasn't worthwhile to steal that information to impersonate me.  Lots of effort for little gain.  But now, a threat actor can steal information for thousands, or millions, of people and use it to impersonate them for financial gain.  Maybe just $10 per identity on average, but that's a lot of money at scale.

We wouldn't have to protect this type of information if it wasn't so useful to those who would use it to impersonate others for illicit financial gain.  We need to find a better way to assure the identity of both parties in virtual transactions.  Then, all of this data that we spend billions trying to protect would become generally useless and we wouldn't have to protect it.  Maybe we should be spending our money on a cure rather than salves for the symptoms.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/4/2020
Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13842
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). A dangerous AT command was made available even though it is unused. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200010 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13843
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS software before 2020-06-01. Local users can cause a denial of service because checking of the userdata partition is mishandled. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200014 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13839
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via a custom AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200007 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13840
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via an MTK AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200008 (June 2020).
CVE-2020-13841
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 9 and 10 (MTK chipsets). An AT command handler allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200009 (June 2020).