Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Microsoft, Mastercard Aim to Change Identity Management
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tDi443
50%
50%
tDi443,
User Rank: Strategist
12/10/2018 | 3:18:41 PM
Re: BLOCKCHAIN
https://www.ccn.com/mastercard-applies-for-new-patent-for-anonymous-blockchain-transactions-a-regulated-bitcoin-tumbler/
Jessica Rochelle
50%
50%
Jessica Rochelle,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/10/2018 | 12:16:08 AM
Re: PCI and security
I am very much pleased with the contents you have mentioned. I wanted to thank you for this great article. 
hungthaixa
50%
50%
hungthaixa,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/7/2018 | 11:18:02 PM
Good article
I like this article. Thanks to that I understand a lot
tDi443
100%
0%
tDi443,
User Rank: Strategist
12/7/2018 | 12:55:57 PM
Re: BLOCKCHAIN
It looks like they are going with AI based sevices for this program. I would be extremely leary of the possiblity for massive privacy abuses by these stakeholders. That's even if they can manage to keep it secure from the hands of criminals and state sponserd hackers. My biggest fear is that this technology would ever fall into the hands of any government.  This identity managerment sceme seeks to create a Universal Online Identiy for everone that uses thier products and services. So basically these corporations will OWN our Cyber-DNA. Very Dangerous concept. I would feel much more  comfortable with a blockchain type solution that could at least protect some sort of anonimity and privacy. It would most likely be a much more secure soolution to the problem of identity managment. 
tDi443
100%
0%
tDi443,
User Rank: Strategist
12/7/2018 | 12:20:49 PM
Re: BLOCKCHAIN
I'm just wondering if these companies will be utulizing blockchain technology in this project. Seems to me like it would be a no-brainer. Ah, but what do I know?
Agent Aix les Bains
50%
50%
Agent Aix les Bains,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/7/2018 | 9:45:37 AM
Re: BLOCKCHAIN
What do you mean ?
tDi443
50%
50%
tDi443,
User Rank: Strategist
12/5/2018 | 1:45:03 AM
BLOCKCHAIN
?
ebyjeeby
100%
0%
ebyjeeby,
User Rank: Strategist
12/4/2018 | 2:05:09 PM
Re: PCI and security
Agreed. Wait for Amazon and VISA to unviel a competing product.
jenshadus
100%
0%
jenshadus,
User Rank: Strategist
12/4/2018 | 9:39:46 AM
PCI and security
I wonder how this will affect PCI and how other CC companies will adapt the new technology.  Guess it all depends on royalties and such.  Then there is iPhone versus the google phones to content with.  This looks like it might be an uphill battle.  Unless they get everyone to play the game it doesn't do the end user much good,


Commentary
What the FedEx Logo Taught Me About Cybersecurity
Matt Shea, Head of Federal @ MixMode,  6/4/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
A View From Inside a Deception
Sara Peters, Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-31811
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an OutOfMemory-Exception while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-31812
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an infinite loop while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-32552
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-16 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32553
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-17 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.
CVE-2021-32554
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the xorg package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.