Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Why the CISSP Remains Relevant to Cybersecurity After 28 Years
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
paul.dittrich
100%
0%
paul.dittrich,
User Rank: Strategist
11/9/2018 | 2:33:27 PM
Re: Security Fundamentals Aren't Changing
True - the fundamentals have not changed and nearly every organization would benefit from a review and re-emphasis of those fundamentals.

But neither can we lose sight of the fact that today's Internet is really just a large experiment that grew wildly out of control and has long since escaped the laboratory.  The early ARPAnet pioneers weren't thinking about security - they were too busy trying to figure out the basic communications between systems.  Many of today's problems are directly traceable to a couple of dozen scientists and engineers who knew each other at least casually and who never envisioned the rapid global expansion of their experiment.  In the days when every single email address in existence fit easily on one side of a standard sheet of paper, nobody was concerned about identity theft or malware.

Yes the fundamentals are still completely necessary.  But they cannot be the entire solution.  When the underlying technologies which built the Internet are inherently insecure, we need more than fixing current software.
neutronneedle
50%
50%
neutronneedle,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/8/2018 | 1:34:12 PM
Security Fundamentals Aren't Changing
The work the CISSP certification is based on was performed in the late 60s and early 70s when it was "discovered" that only trust of the Systems staff wasn't adequate security protection.

Fundamentals are fundamentals. I have a chemistry professor friend who puts it this way in her field, "The Periodic Table of the Elements hasn't changed much lately."

The real area of concern should be, why are we still not caught up with the security processes of those early mainframe days?

One might also ask a similar question about the engineering quality of software in many devices attached to the internet these days. We could be asking ourselves, "If we don't have time to do it right the first time, when will we have time to redo it?"

We could also ask, "How will we undo/extract the damage done from putting that defective software out there in the first place?"


US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
Fed Kaspersky Ban Made Permanent by New Rules
Dark Reading Staff 9/11/2019
NetCAT Vulnerability Is Out of the Bag
Dark Reading Staff 9/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16395
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
GnuCOBOL 2.2 has a stack-based buffer overflow in the cb_name() function in cobc/tree.c via crafted COBOL source code.
CVE-2019-16396
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
GnuCOBOL 2.2 has a use-after-free in the end_scope_of_program_name() function in cobc/parser.y via crafted COBOL source code.
CVE-2019-16199
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
eQ-3 Homematic CCU2 before 2.47.18 and CCU3 before 3.47.18 allow Remote Code Execution by unauthenticated attackers with access to the web interface via an HTTP POST request to certain URLs related to the ReGa core process.
CVE-2019-16391
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
SPIP before 3.1.11 and 3.2 before 3.2.5 allows authenticated visitors to modify any published content and execute other modifications in the database. This is related to ecrire/inc/meta.php and ecrire/inc/securiser_action.php.
CVE-2019-16392
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-17
SPIP before 3.1.11 and 3.2 before 3.2.5 allows prive/formulaires/login.php XSS via error messages.