Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Where Is the Consumer Outrage about Data Breaches?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RFordOnSecurity
100%
0%
RFordOnSecurity,
User Rank: Author
11/5/2018 | 6:45:40 AM
Re: Outrage: tracking the wrong thing.
It took me a while to think about this, but I think I now understand your reasoning. Here's the thing. While some countries claim to be democratic republics, you should mostly focus on the "democratic" part of that description. Thus, the lack of voter concern effectively makes this less of an issue for the politicians. In a true democracy, laws reflect the will of the people, and without *voter* outrage companies (who sometimes have signficant influence in the legislative process) will have a much larger role than we would like in shaping the next generation of laws. 

I do agree laws help - but I think laws in the long term reflect the concerns of society, and thus the outrage really does matter. 

Lastly, for most senior executives in large companies, the largest part of compensation is tied to stock performance; thus, the stock price is a strong incentive for shaping the actions of C-Suite members. 
DonT183
0%
100%
DonT183,
User Rank: Black Belt
11/2/2018 | 4:24:32 PM
Outrage: tracking the wrong thing.
The cost of customer outrage is not in the stock price nor in the dust and ashes public. Mourning for the lost. Look here and one will never see the costs. Concluding a policy based on known short term effects is logic worthy of the doomed Flying Dutchmen. Doomed never to see the truth and cursed to manage a problem that was never rightly measured or seen. Look instead at the costs to the business in its avoidable customer retention costs. Look also for the new legislation pending with your firm name as its justification. Everyone knows that Enron and WorldCom cause Sarbanes Oxley regulations. We all bear the increased costs to comply consequentially. Honestly a data breach could easily cost a firm 4% of its annual revenue in dirext IT and customer retention clean up costs. The fine for not reporting bound up in new European regulation has its basis in average damage experiences of firms that did report. These legal concepts are coming to a country near you. Watch that metric for better insight. Or, circle the oceans in a never ending quest, guided by the wrong stars and never to see the problem for what it is.
DonT183
50%
50%
DonT183,
User Rank: Black Belt
11/2/2018 | 4:24:28 PM
Outrage: tracking the wrong thing.
The cost of customer outrage is not in the stock price nor in the dust and ashes public. Mourning for the lost. Look here and one will never see the costs. Concluding a policy based on known short term effects is logic worthy of the doomed Flying Dutchmen. Doomed never to see the truth and cursed to manage a problem that was never rightly measured or seen. Look instead at the costs to the business in its avoidable customer retention costs. Look also for the new legislation pending with your firm name as its justification. Everyone knows that Enron and WorldCom cause Sarbanes Oxley regulations. We all bear the increased costs to comply consequentially. Honestly a data breach could easily cost a firm 4% of its annual revenue in dirext IT and customer retention clean up costs. The fine for not reporting bound up in new European regulation has its basis in average damage experiences of firms that did report. These legal concepts are coming to a country near you. Watch that metric for better insight. Or, circle the oceans in a never ending quest, guided by the wrong stars and never to see the problem for what it is.
DonT183
50%
50%
DonT183,
User Rank: Black Belt
11/2/2018 | 4:24:00 PM
Outrage: tracking the wrong thing.
The cost of customer outrage is not in the stock price nor in the dust and ashes public. Mourning for the lost. Look here and one will never see the costs. Concluding a policy based on known short term effects is logic worthy of the doomed Flying Dutchmen. Doomed never to see the truth and cursed to manage a problem that was never rightly measured or seen. Look instead at the costs to the business in its avoidable customer retention costs. Look also for the new legislation pending with your firm name as its justification. Everyone knows that Enron and WorldCom cause Sarbanes Oxley regulations. We all bear the increased costs to comply consequentially. Honestly a data breach could easily cost a firm 4% of its annual revenue in dirext IT and customer retention clean up costs. The fine for not reporting bound up in new European regulation has its basis in average damage experiences of firms that did report. These legal concepts are coming to a country near you. Watch that metric for better insight. Or, circle the oceans in a never ending quest, guided by the wrong stars and never to see the problem for what it is.


Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Black Hat Q&A: Hacking a '90s Sports Car
Black Hat Staff, ,  11/7/2019
The Cold Truth about Cyber Insurance
Chris Kennedy, CISO & VP Customer Success, AttackIQ,  11/7/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16863
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
STMicroelectronics ST33TPHF2ESPI TPM devices before 2019-09-12 allow attackers to extract the ECDSA private key via a side-channel timing attack because ECDSA scalar multiplication is mishandled, aka TPM-FAIL.
CVE-2019-18949
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
SnowHaze before 2.6.6 is sometimes too late to honor a per-site JavaScript blocking setting, which leads to unintended JavaScript execution via a chain of webpage redirections targeted to the user's browser configuration.
CVE-2011-1930
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
In klibc 1.5.20 and 1.5.21, the DHCP options written by ipconfig to /tmp/net-$DEVICE.conf are not properly escaped. This may allow a remote attacker to send a specially crafted DHCP reply which could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of any process which sources DHCP options.
CVE-2011-1145
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
The SQLDriverConnect() function in unixODBC before 2.2.14p2 have a possible buffer overflow condition when specifying a large value for SAVEFILE parameter in the connection string.
CVE-2011-1488
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
A memory leak in rsyslog before 5.7.6 was found in the way deamon processed log messages are logged when $RepeatedMsgReduction was enabled. A local attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of the rsyslogd daemon service by crashing the service via a sequence of repeated log messages sent withi...