Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
The Case for MarDevSecOps
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
viopoker
50%
50%
viopoker,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/5/2018 | 8:48:32 AM
I just now
I just now evolving DevOps into DevSecOps

 

 
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 10:45:35 PM
Re: Where the problem is.
@Dr.T: Conversely, however, in many organizations, marketing's hands would effectively be tied if they had to run everything through IT (especially in those orgs where the marketing department frequently faces uphill battles to justify itself to operations people who don't understand what marketing does, what good marketing looks like, or why marketing is important). You can really only deal with this with partnership between IT and marketing, from the top down. But that takes a huge effort that many orgs simply don't feel that they can afford.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 10:43:20 PM
Re: God, please, no; stop this bullshit.
I agree, @Jim. Vendors are great for outsourcing certain things, but the one thing you should never outsource (or, at least, almost never) is strategy. Strategy has to come from within, and that requires the kind of holistic approach you're talking about -- buzzword combos aside.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 10:41:44 PM
Sec vs. Privacy vs. Compliance
The only problem with all of this philosophizing is that security, privacy, and compliance -- while comprising the greater Venn diagram of data stewardship -- remain separate (if partially overlapping) circles. Security is not privacy. Privacy is not compliance. Compliance is not security. It's really going to take much more interaction to get marketing on board with these regulations -- as well as to be proactive enough with privacy, security, and best practices such that future regulation and law don't cause too big of a speed bump. Ditto for dev teams (who are just as guilty of making bad decisions with data).
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 12:49:12 PM
Where the problem is.
If DevSecOps stakeholders don't include marketing or worse, let marketing continue to think it is safe to take IT procurement in its own hands Obviously this is where the problem is. IT can easily be by-passed.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 12:46:19 PM
User need
If marketing were brought into the process, it could help developers intimately understand the end user's needs I agree with this statement. We tend to develop things that nobody needs.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 9:30:13 AM
Re: God, please, no; stop this bullshit.
intelligent group internally to talk about how that plays into centralized consent management, etc This makes sense. Marketing and other groups should be part of it in my view.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 9:17:49 AM
Re: God, please, no; stop this bullshit.
The more things you do, the less solid results are. It is inevitable. Laws of physics. This is a fair point. However these days we are being asked more with less.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 9:12:05 AM
MarDevSecOps
I like the concept of MarDevSecOps. Marketing should be streamlined into security operations for sure.
jim.kaskade
50%
50%
jim.kaskade,
User Rank: Author
10/30/2018 | 5:40:11 PM
Re: God, please, no; stop this bullshit.
Fair enough. I wasn't advocating for a new group (like MarDevSecFinJanitorChefOps). I was saying that before my CMO pulls in yet another marketing tool (lets look at Scott Brinker's ChiefMarTech list), one might sit down with an intelligent group internally to talk about how that plays into centralized consent management, etc.).

It's more about bringing the fragmented players together when it comes to consumer data.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19740
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
Octeth Oempro 4.7 allows SQL injection. The parameter CampaignID in Campaign.Get is vulnerable.
CVE-2019-19746
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
make_arrow in arrow.c in Xfig fig2dev 3.2.7b allows a segmentation fault and out-of-bounds write because of an integer overflow via a large arrow type.
CVE-2019-19748
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
The Work Time Calendar app before 4.7.1 for Jira allows XSS.
CVE-2017-18640
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
The Alias feature in SnakeYAML 1.18 allows entity expansion during a load operation, a related issue to CVE-2003-1564.
CVE-2019-19726
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
OpenBSD through 6.6 allows local users to escalate to root because a check for LD_LIBRARY_PATH in setuid programs can be defeated by setting a very small RLIMIT_DATA resource limit. When executing chpass or passwd (which are setuid root), _dl_setup_env in ld.so tries to strip LD_LIBRARY_PATH from th...