Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
The Case for MarDevSecOps
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
viopoker
50%
50%
viopoker,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/5/2018 | 8:48:32 AM
I just now
I just now evolving DevOps into DevSecOps

 

 
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 10:45:35 PM
Re: Where the problem is.
@Dr.T: Conversely, however, in many organizations, marketing's hands would effectively be tied if they had to run everything through IT (especially in those orgs where the marketing department frequently faces uphill battles to justify itself to operations people who don't understand what marketing does, what good marketing looks like, or why marketing is important). You can really only deal with this with partnership between IT and marketing, from the top down. But that takes a huge effort that many orgs simply don't feel that they can afford.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 10:43:20 PM
Re: God, please, no; stop this bullshit.
I agree, @Jim. Vendors are great for outsourcing certain things, but the one thing you should never outsource (or, at least, almost never) is strategy. Strategy has to come from within, and that requires the kind of holistic approach you're talking about -- buzzword combos aside.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 10:41:44 PM
Sec vs. Privacy vs. Compliance
The only problem with all of this philosophizing is that security, privacy, and compliance -- while comprising the greater Venn diagram of data stewardship -- remain separate (if partially overlapping) circles. Security is not privacy. Privacy is not compliance. Compliance is not security. It's really going to take much more interaction to get marketing on board with these regulations -- as well as to be proactive enough with privacy, security, and best practices such that future regulation and law don't cause too big of a speed bump. Ditto for dev teams (who are just as guilty of making bad decisions with data).
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 12:49:12 PM
Where the problem is.
If DevSecOps stakeholders don't include marketing or worse, let marketing continue to think it is safe to take IT procurement in its own hands Obviously this is where the problem is. IT can easily be by-passed.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 12:46:19 PM
User need
If marketing were brought into the process, it could help developers intimately understand the end user's needs I agree with this statement. We tend to develop things that nobody needs.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 9:30:13 AM
Re: God, please, no; stop this bullshit.
intelligent group internally to talk about how that plays into centralized consent management, etc This makes sense. Marketing and other groups should be part of it in my view.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 9:17:49 AM
Re: God, please, no; stop this bullshit.
The more things you do, the less solid results are. It is inevitable. Laws of physics. This is a fair point. However these days we are being asked more with less.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2018 | 9:12:05 AM
MarDevSecOps
I like the concept of MarDevSecOps. Marketing should be streamlined into security operations for sure.
jim.kaskade
50%
50%
jim.kaskade,
User Rank: Author
10/30/2018 | 5:40:11 PM
Re: God, please, no; stop this bullshit.
Fair enough. I wasn't advocating for a new group (like MarDevSecFinJanitorChefOps). I was saying that before my CMO pulls in yet another marketing tool (lets look at Scott Brinker's ChiefMarTech list), one might sit down with an intelligent group internally to talk about how that plays into centralized consent management, etc.).

It's more about bringing the fragmented players together when it comes to consumer data.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.