Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Data Breaches at Timehop, Macy's Highlight Need for Multi-Factor Authentication
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RetiredUser
100%
0%
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
7/10/2018 | 9:09:41 AM
Re: Culture > MFA
I agree but I would also note that even with valid credentials some MFA solutions that require both a mobile token and answering a revolving question from a pool of pre-configuered questions could still stop such intrusions.  Additionally, while still young, risk-based authentication (RBA) on top of that could also help weed out bad actors with valid credentials. 
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
7/9/2018 | 8:10:20 PM
Culture > MFA
While MFA could certainly have prevented or mitigated the damage from these breaches or breaches like these, in my experience these types of breaches tend to have a more fundamental cause beyond a lack of MFA: a lack of a good security culture that led to exploitable weaknesses to begin with.

Case in point here: securitynow.com/author.asp?section_id=613&doc_id=734774
RetiredUser
50%
50%
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
7/9/2018 | 7:13:05 PM
Improvements in MFA Could Help
Since I don't design solutions, I haven't put too much deep thought into this yet, but over the last year I documented the following statistics and I can see why end users are getting MFA over MFA.  While we are well aware of the need for MFA and similar forms of security, our end users are simply seeing numbers like this and resisting.  Some have the smarts to bypass some MFA (though these days the majority of solutions are too smart to bypass) or simply STOP using some sites as often as they need to or should because of numbers like this.  Call me lazy but even for me, a seasoned techie, this seems like a lot of robot calls answered, lots of texts and browser codes entered.

MFA Contacts over 12 Months

MFA Cell Phone Calls:   2,803

MFA Cell Phone Texts: 1,741

MFA Browser-Delivered Codes: 972

But, let's assume the end user complaints have nothing to do with a company choosing to implement MFA (let's be honest, how many orgs really listen to their end-users anyway). The article notes one reason many companies might be skipping the MFA step in their security plan, which is the need for software on both the server and user endpoints. I was involved in an MFA implementation and it became quite complicated. A software install on the server, followed by embedded web code, and then an end-user desktop install on top of a mobile token app.

Again, not a solutions designer but some improvements in MFA could help get organizations to 100% implementation (despite end-user complaints).

 


Stop Defending Everything
Kevin Kurzawa, Senior Information Security Auditor,  2/12/2020
Small Business Security: 5 Tips on How and Where to Start
Mike Puglia, Chief Strategy Officer at Kaseya,  2/13/2020
5 Common Errors That Allow Attackers to Go Undetected
Matt Middleton-Leal, General Manager and Chief Security Strategist, Netwrix,  2/12/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5613
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
In FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE before 12.0-RELEASE-p13, a missing check in the ipsec packet processor allows reinjection of an old packet to be accepted by the ipsec endpoint. Depending on the higher-level protocol in use over ipsec, this could allow an action to be repeated.
CVE-2020-7450
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
In FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r357213, 12.1-RELEASE before 12.1-RELEASE-p2, 12.0-RELEASE before 12.0-RELEASE-p13, 11.3-STABLE before r357214, and 11.3-RELEASE before 11.3-RELEASE-p6, URL handling in libfetch with URLs containing username and/or password components is vulnerable to a heap buffer over...
CVE-2019-10792
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
bodymen before 1.1.1 is vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The handler function could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a __proto__ payload.
CVE-2019-10793
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
dot-object before 2.1.3 is vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The set function could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a __proto__ payload.
CVE-2019-10794
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
All versions of component-flatten are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The a function could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a __proto__ payload.