Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Equifax Software Manager Charged with Insider Trading
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2018 | 1:55:02 PM
Not Surprising
This is not surprising to me in the least. I would be surprised however if it was to be the last person charged in light of the Equifax breach.
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2018 | 2:45:09 PM
Re: Not Surprising
I would be surprised however if it was to be the last person charged in light of the Equifax breach. I would agree. But these are mistakes after the mistakes, not root course of the problem they are in.
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2018 | 2:00:27 PM
Best Practice?
Can someone explain to me what is best practice in these scenarios? I find it somewhat confusing. If someone inadvertently told you that your investments were going to plummet unless you dropped them due to an event with the company are you suppose to just steer your boat into the iceberg? 

This is a cynical representation of it of course but seriously I can't fathom being in that position and would like someone who is better versed legally to shed some light on the matter.
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2018 | 2:46:42 PM
Re: Best Practice?
Can someone explain to me what is best practice in these scenarios? I think this is a good question. I am not sure if thee is a best practice in this case.
BradleyRoss
BradleyRoss,
User Rank: Moderator
6/30/2018 | 2:26:14 PM
Re: Best Practice?
I think that the problem is that there is no defined best practice with regard to securing the data.  The comment that I heard from someone at the FBI was that if they published a best practice or good practice document, people might hold them to it and use the document to avoid legal penalty.  I was somewhat incredulout about this answer since it meant that lack of a "good practices" document made it almost impossible to bring a legal charge against the firm.

Insider trading is a different matter in the law more clearly specifies what constitutes a breach of the law.  It is therefore much easier to bring criminal charges and obtain a guilty verdict.
REISEN1955
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
7/2/2018 | 10:31:58 AM
Re: Best Practice?
I cannot help but think that many Equifax employees will have great new careers at Wells Fargo. LOL
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2018 | 2:48:04 PM
Re: Best Practice?
This is a cynical representation of it of course but seriously I can't fathom being in that position and would like someone who is better versed legally to shed some light on the matter. I would say this would depend on circumstances of the case, each case would be different, mainly around intention.
blackjack0021
blackjack0021,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/30/2018 | 1:08:11 AM
Re: Best Practice?
First, he didn't sell stock he already owned to avoid the decrease in value. He purposefully purchased PUT options. Meaning he placed a bet the stock would drop, and when it did he cashed in. Second, google insider trading wiki. Best practice doesn't mean anything here, there are specific laws that say what you are NOT ALLOWED to do. And yes, you could be stuck knowing your stock is about to become worthless, and you can't legally sell it before the news breaks, or warn others to do so.
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2018 | 2:44:16 PM
Fallout
Fallout from the epic Equifax data breach just keeps coming For me it it is better to focus on why these type of massive attacks happenin the first place and the focus on what people did wrong once it happened. We have no clue what went wrong.
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2018 | 2:49:49 PM
CIO
Equifax's former chief information officer, Jun Ying, earlier this year pleaded not guilty to charges of insider trading related to the data breach Charges on insider trading? How about not securing the network as it should be, so no charge on that!
blackjack0021
blackjack0021,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/30/2018 | 1:16:24 AM
Re: CIO
Come on, reality check. If we charged every CIO who oversaw a network that wasn't 100% secure, and/or patched.... you'd be charging EVERY CIO. Drop down to 90% secure/patched and you'd only have to charge 90% of CIO's, etc. Veracode publicly said they saw 90% of their customers STILL had systems with the same Apache Struts app unpatched six months after Equifax. Not making excuses for them, but being outraged doesnt change reality.... every company has similar issues, and everyone's data was already stolen.
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
7/2/2018 | 5:05:20 PM
Re: CIO
@blackjack: To say nothing of the fact that there is no such thing as 100% secure -- unless you have 0% accessibility.

Moreover, to open CIOs and their ilk up to criminal charges for this kind of thing would mean that they would command mega-salaries in excess of their CEOs -- so as to compensate for the risk.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Machine Learning, AI & Deep Learning Improve Cybersecurity
Machine intelligence is influencing all aspects of cybersecurity. Organizations are implementing AI-based security to analyze event data using ML models that identify attack patterns and increase automation. Before security teams can take advantage of AI and ML tools, they need to know what is possible. This report covers: -How to assess the vendor's AI/ML claims -Defining success criteria for AI/ML implementations -Challenges when implementing AI
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-42247
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-03
pfSense v2.5.2 was discovered to contain a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the browser.php component. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a file name.
CVE-2022-41443
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-03
phpipam v1.5.0 was discovered to contain a header injection vulnerability via the component /admin/subnets/ripe-query.php.
CVE-2022-33882
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-03
Under certain conditions, an attacker could create an unintended sphere of control through a vulnerability present in file delete operation in Autodesk desktop app (ADA). An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2022-42306
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-03
An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup through 8.2 and related Veritas products. An attacker with local access can send a crafted packet to pbx_exchange during registration and cause a NULL pointer exception, effectively crashing the pbx_exchange process.
CVE-2022-42307
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-03
An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup through 10.0.0.1 and related Veritas products. The NetBackup Primary server is vulnerable to an XML External Entity (XXE) Injection attack through the DiscoveryService service.