Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-34491PUBLISHED: 2022-06-25
In the RSS extension for MediaWiki through 1.38.1, when the $wgRSSAllowLinkTag config variable was set to true, and a new RSS feed was created with certain XSS payloads within its description tags and added to the $wgRSSUrlWhitelist config variable, stored XSS could occur via MediaWiki's template sy...
CVE-2022-29931PUBLISHED: 2022-06-25Raytion 7.2.0 allows reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS).
CVE-2022-31017PUBLISHED: 2022-06-25
Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. Versions 2.1.0 through and including 5.2 are vulnerable to a logic error. A stream configured as private with protected history, where new subscribers should not be allowed to see messages sent before they were subscribed, when edited causes the serve...
CVE-2022-31016PUBLISHED: 2022-06-25
Argo CD is a declarative continuous deployment for Kubernetes. Argo CD versions v0.7.0 and later are vulnerable to an uncontrolled memory consumption bug, allowing an authorized malicious user to crash the repo-server service, resulting in a Denial of Service. The attacker must be an authenticated A...
CVE-2022-24893PUBLISHED: 2022-06-25
ESP-IDF is the official development framework for Espressif SoCs. In Espressif’s Bluetooth Mesh SDK (`ESP-BLE-MESH`), a memory corruption vulnerability can be triggered during provisioning, because there is no check for the `SegN` field of the Transaction Start PDU. This can resul...
User Rank: Apprentice
5/31/2018 | 2:32:44 AM
Thanks for the tip, appreciate it. Your article definitely helped me to understand the core concepts.
I'm most excited about the details your article touch based! I assume it doesn't come out of the box, it sounds like you are saying we'd need to write in the handlers ourselves.
Is there any other articles you would recommend to understand this better?
In the HANA migration guide, it is stated to run some consistency checks in FICO (see verbiage below).
I have run these, but I really don't know what I'm looking for - are we running just to make sure they run, running to validate numbers on the reports? Thoughts & guidance are appreciated. Thank you!
3.8 FI/CO: Performing Additional Consistency Checks
To ensure that the source system is consistent, user of Financial Accounting (FI) and Controlling (CO) need to perform some preparatory activities, among others additional consistency checks.
3.2 Product-Specific Preparations of the System Copy Guide, which is mentioned in Further Documentation [page 6].Caution Make sure that no customer data is changed in the meantime. Proceed as follows:
Procedure
1. FI: Run job SAPF190 to perform an additional consistency check. Choose AccountingFinancial AccountingGeneral ledgerPeriodic ProcessingClosingCheck/count. Then choose for○ classic FI: Reconciliation○ new general ledger: Reconciliation (New)
2. FI: You can further check consistency by running the jobs listed below:
○ RFUMSV00 (tax on sales/purchases)
○ RAGITT01 (asset history sheet)
○ RAZUGA01 (asset acquisitions)
○ RAABGA01 (fixed asset retirements)
3. CO: Run the report group 1SIP
Appreciate your effort for making such useful blogs and helping the community.
Thanks a heaps,
Irene Hynes