Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
What Meltdown and Spectre Mean for Mobile Device Security
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
BradleyRoss
50%
50%
BradleyRoss,
User Rank: Moderator
5/4/2018 | 7:16:16 PM
New techniques are required
A number of people assume that virtual machines can't extract unauthorized data from other virtual machines on the server.  In the same way, they assume that virtual memory will stop one application from accessing the memory belonging to another application.  Spectre and Meltdown, together with problems with the Atom Tables for Microsoft Windows, are indications that these assumptions are no longer safe.  We need to either isolate applictions on systems completely with one application per computer system, or provide better protection between processing in a multi-processing environment.

A number of compilers can reduce the level of optimization by changing options.  Perhaps what we need are means to turn off optimization techniques such as look ahead pre-calculation on a per process basis to increase security.  As long as the reduced optimization is limited to processes that run less that five percent of the total cycles, the impact on performance may be minimal.
JTKeating
50%
50%
JTKeating,
User Rank: Author
5/1/2018 | 11:56:44 AM
Re: "Matter of whether companies update their employees' devices"
I completely agree, Ryan.  As I mentioned in the post, the lack of a patch management system for mobile forces us to tackle the problem a different way. As you mentioned, using policies (including deciding what users can and cannot access based on the OS level / risk of their device) is one way to drive users to the desired behavior. We have seen the difference. Some of our customers that don't enforce based on OS level have some users on version that are so old it is scary. For example, I have seen users on iOS 5... iOS is currently on 11.x! Thanks for the thoughts!
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/30/2018 | 10:59:53 PM
For those that offer mobile options
For those that offer mobile devices to their users, ensure that corporate policy dictates strict oversight of the device. This couple with an Enterprise Device Management system can be a saving grace in ubiquitous exposures such as this.
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/30/2018 | 10:57:29 PM
"Matter of whether companies update their employees' devices"
This point sticks out in my mind. The patches are available and the manufacturers can only make the suggestion but its the responsibility of the company to enforce compliance. Otherwise end users will non-functionality based updates like the plague.


Zero-Factor Authentication: Owning Our Data
Nick Selby, Chief Security Officer at Paxos Trust Company,  2/19/2020
44% of Security Threats Start in the Cloud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/19/2020
Firms Improve Threat Detection but Face Increasingly Disruptive Attacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8860
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-22
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Samsung Galaxy S10 Firmware G973FXXS3ASJA, O(8.x), P(9.0), Q(10.0) devices with Exynos chipsets. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must answer a phone call. ...
CVE-2020-8861
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-22
This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of D-Link DAP-1330 1.10B01 BETA Wi-Fi range extenders. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of HNAP login requests. The issue...
CVE-2020-8862
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-22
This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of D-Link DAP-2610 Firmware v2.01RC067 routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of passwords. The issue results from the...
CVE-2020-9330
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Certain Xerox WorkCentre printers before 073.xxx.000.02300 do not require the user to reenter or validate LDAP bind credentials when changing the LDAP connector IP address. A malicious actor who gains access to affected devices (e.g., by using default credentials) can change the LDAP connection IP a...
CVE-2020-9327
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
In SQLite 3.31.1, isAuxiliaryVtabOperator allows attackers to trigger a NULL pointer dereference and segmentation fault because of generated column optimizations.