Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
On-Premise Security Tools Struggle to Survive in the Cloud
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
4/12/2018 | 12:49:31 PM
People are afraid of change
"Adopting cloud-based security tools may require a learning curve, but Gerchow warns companies that sticking with on-prem tools amid the move to the cloud can be dangerous."

This is the most important aspect of the whole document because organizations have not taken the time to fully understand the implications and redesign concepts of the cloud (basically they have not changed their thinking). In this new ecosystem, the cloud is not the all to end all, if you have problems on-premise then the same problems are going to resurface in the cloud due to the bad practices and engineering designs companies have employed at their primary locations.

We need to have an external party, someone who is familiar with cloud design/architecture, implementation, integration and data migration principles. First they would need to perform an assessment, identify any gaps or dependencies associated with the security application, determine (feasibility analysis) if the solution meets their needs, identify costs and then develop a plan to move into that area with a team who is knowledgeable of the intricacies of that CSP (Cloud Service Provider).

If the organizations followed this guidance, then most of the respondents would have a more favorable view of the cloud because it was treated as a project, as history has it, most organizations do not do this, they present the idea to one of their engineers, the engineer has never worked with the provider before, they have to research and figure out how the technology works in the cloud and the cloud application itself, then determine if the application they are used to is provided in the marketplace of that CSP. With all of this, the engineer becomes frustrated and the project is stalled because of the lack of understanding during the inception of the project.

The take away from all of this is as follows:
  • Educate specific members of the organization that you design cloud points of contact
  • Engage a third-party entity to help identify nuances with cloud adoption
  • Develop a 5 point plan using "Agile Scrum" methodologies to help with the deployment process - https://goo.gl/7Bvg6s (Gartner Cloud Adoption Plan)
  • Allow for adequate time to train, test, develop, implement, integrate, deploy your solution in the cloud
  • Finally, document lessons learned and document processes along the way allowing for Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to be created during this cloud adoption process

If we follow these steps, I do think the move from on-prem solutions to hybrid off-prem solutions would allow for great understanding and awareness during our journey to Enterprise Global Systems design.

Todd - ITOTS Networks, LLC


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Machine Learning, AI & Deep Learning Improve Cybersecurity
Machine intelligence is influencing all aspects of cybersecurity. Organizations are implementing AI-based security to analyze event data using ML models that identify attack patterns and increase automation. Before security teams can take advantage of AI and ML tools, they need to know what is possible. This report covers: -How to assess the vendor's AI/ML claims -Defining success criteria for AI/ML implementations -Challenges when implementing AI
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-42247
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-03
pfSense v2.5.2 was discovered to contain a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the browser.php component. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a file name.
CVE-2022-41443
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-03
phpipam v1.5.0 was discovered to contain a header injection vulnerability via the component /admin/subnets/ripe-query.php.
CVE-2022-33882
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-03
Under certain conditions, an attacker could create an unintended sphere of control through a vulnerability present in file delete operation in Autodesk desktop app (ADA). An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2022-42306
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-03
An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup through 8.2 and related Veritas products. An attacker with local access can send a crafted packet to pbx_exchange during registration and cause a NULL pointer exception, effectively crashing the pbx_exchange process.
CVE-2022-42307
PUBLISHED: 2022-10-03
An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup through 10.0.0.1 and related Veritas products. The NetBackup Primary server is vulnerable to an XML External Entity (XXE) Injection attack through the DiscoveryService service.