Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Mueller May Indict Russians Who Hacked DNC
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
sporter117
0%
100%
sporter117,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/7/2018 | 4:55:34 PM
Re: Wrong collusion
Agreed...

Want to look like a russian, hack a russian computer then attack your target...

51% of attacks are insiders, so I have always felt Seth Rich was the likely suspect.

Especially since he was killed while being robbed, yet his wallet was left on him with cash in it.

 
REISEN1955
0%
100%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
3/5/2018 | 12:35:22 PM
Wrong collusion
Russian Hackers have done alot but they did not hack the DNC on first crack - that data breach was a (now dead) DNC staffer who handed Julian Assange a ton of information.  Physical transfer of data.  Hand to hand.  Assange has said so over and over and so far NOBODY HAS FOUND HIM WRONG.   They do not like his methods but he tells truth.  Personally I think of him as Ernst Stavro Blofeld --- all he needs is a Nehru jacket and a white cat.  Now the DNC was hacked in other areas later on.  Podesta and Madame Oven Mitt's famous server. 
SchemaCzar
0%
100%
SchemaCzar,
User Rank: Strategist
3/3/2018 | 3:35:21 PM
Since when are Russian hackers stupid enough to leak their own phishing emails?
Blaming the Russians for wikileaks is ridiculous.  Advanced cyber war teams for nation-states don't leave tracks.  Yes, Podesta was stupid enough to fall for a trivial phishing scam, but how stupid would it be to release the emails that included your own phishing breach?  Too stupid for Russians.

Wikileaks says it received the emails as a leak from someone authorized to see that information.  The emails were genuine. Why would Wikileaks jeopardize its own credibility by lying about its sources?


7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment:   It's a PEN test of our cloud security.
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-9720
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
Tornado before 3.2.2 sends arbitrary responses that contain a fixed CSRF token and may be sent with HTTP compression, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct a BREACH attack and determine this token via a series of crafted requests.
CVE-2015-1525
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
audio/AudioPolicyManagerBase.cpp in Android before 5.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (audio_policy application outage) via a crafted application that provides a NULL device address.
CVE-2015-1530
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
media/libmedia/IAudioPolicyService.cpp in Android before 5.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code with media_server privileges or cause a denial of service (integer overflow) via a crafted application that provides an invalid array size.
CVE-2015-2688
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
buf_pullup in Tor before 0.2.4.26 and 0.2.5.x before 0.2.5.11 does not properly handle unexpected arrival times of buffers with invalid layouts, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via crafted packets.
CVE-2015-2689
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
Tor before 0.2.4.26 and 0.2.5.x before 0.2.5.11 does not properly handle pending-connection resolve states during periods of high DNS load, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via crafted packets.