Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Intel Processor Security Flaw Prompts Kernel Makeovers in Linux, Windows
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
caodangyduocsaigon
50%
50%
caodangyduocsaigon,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/1/2018 | 3:39:30 AM
Re: ...and what about Apple?
Renowned security expert Dan Kaminsky says without the details of the flaw out yet, it doesn't make sense to theorize about its ramifications. "I think we shouldn't speculate until the bug is disclosed," Kaminsky says. "Clearly, the notable part of this is whatever it is can't be addressed in microcode."
Ludivina
50%
50%
Ludivina,
User Rank: Strategist
2/3/2018 | 8:28:18 PM
Re: ...and what about IG followers for Apple's?
Well, there were different mentions from different blogs. Can you please tell me where did you found those sentences at?
BowlOfPetunias
50%
50%
BowlOfPetunias,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/1/2018 | 4:54:09 AM
And then what?
Suppose an attacker succeeds in exploiting this. What do they get back? A long string of jumbled text and numbers that looks like it might be a password? How do they know it's a password? How do they know it's all of the password and not cut short? I'm not totally clear how much of a benefit there is to an attacker. Probably not an instant win for the attacker, anyway. Some himan input would be needed from them.
dan91266
50%
50%
dan91266,
User Rank: Strategist
1/31/2018 | 11:04:41 PM
Re: ...and what about Apple?
Still pretfy quiet on 'sploits for this... Calm before the storm, or much ado about othing?
dan91266
50%
50%
dan91266,
User Rank: Strategist
1/19/2018 | 12:57:39 PM
Re: ...and what about IG followers for Apple's?
Another analyst here sumbled across a place called skyfallattack.com.  Could be a wateringhole attack in and of itself, so proceed with caution.   It's been almost 24 hours since it came up and I am thinking that if it were credible it would be HUGE news, but not hearing much. 

As always, take everything with a healthy grain of salt. I am HIGHLY skepticcal but thought it worth mentioning.

A genuine sploit for this would be AWEFUL.  So far though, it seems like all the benfits the hypothetical attack vector brings are more easily achieved other ways.  As in "Click here to claim your prize...

 

Cheers,

Dan91266
BrianN060
100%
0%
BrianN060,
User Rank: Ninja
1/19/2018 | 11:37:40 AM
Re: M/S exploits in the wild?
Reports of weaponized versions of the M/S exploits are not the same as evidence that some attacker has used them, or tried.  As attacks would likely be sophisticated, and against high-value targets; the attacks may have already begun - just not yet noticed. 

We have to consider that any victims might be slow to admit the fact. We also have to consider that existing vulnerabilities, exploits and attack vectors are causing more than enough damage without M/S.  Is there a danger of putting too much focus on, and too many resources defending against, the potential?
dan91266
50%
50%
dan91266,
User Rank: Strategist
1/18/2018 | 9:42:52 PM
Re: ...and what about Apple?
Well one source is finally reporting today that they have seen weaponized versions of these sploits. They claim they cannot release details due to government restrictions or until chip vendors fix this, they are not entirely clear.

No confirmation yet that I have seen from a reliable source of truth so this may just be a really mean watering hole attack of some sort, or it may be the real deal.  If IBM X-Force, Cisco, or Microsoft or other reliable source confirms this... Katie bar the door!

My bet is that if this gets real you are suddenly going to see a prolifertion of non Intel, AMD, ARM custom ASICS with proprietary micro-code become real popular, real quick.  With virtualization technology so good, there is scant reason to run risky hardware, RISCy maybe, but not risky (sorry, couldn'resist the pun). I think the point is valid though, all puns aside.

This could get interesting fast. Wonder what the Rainbow Book/NIST guys have to handle this.  I understand that if you run trusted code (Cert signed code, I think), you are not vulnerable to the 'sploits. But who the heck runs 100% Microsoft signed code?

BTW, you Apple folks could be in the, uh sh*thole (to use a currently popular epithet) also. Lotta Macs on Intel silicon aren't there?

 

Cheers,

Dan S.
BrianN060
50%
50%
BrianN060,
User Rank: Ninja
1/17/2018 | 2:12:14 PM
Re: ...and what about IG followers for Apple's?
I've been listening for the other shoe to drop, too. 

One the one side, exploiting these vulnerabilities seems to require a sophisticated, targeted, attack - indicating a high-value target, and stealth.  On the other, there is a window that will close, as more and better mitigations/solutions are developed and applied - so if they are going to leverage these vulnerabilities, they have to move quickly. 

What attackers could be after is not a quick score, but the prerequisites for a big score at some point in the future.  Could be we won't see signs of a significant exploitation unless and until forensics from that future hit point back to access and assets gained now. 
dan91266
50%
50%
dan91266,
User Rank: Strategist
1/16/2018 | 4:17:46 PM
Re: ...and what about IG followers for Apple's?
Has ANYONE reported an actual threat that uses these exploits?  Seems like this is still pretty theoretical at the moment.  It also looks like some facncy assembler code will be needed to exploit these vulnerabilities, or am I just not getting it?
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
1/4/2018 | 10:20:18 AM
Re: ...and what about Apple?
We'll be reporting more on this today, including about Apple. Stay tuned! thanks.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Latest Comment: Exactly
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-4590
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 20.0.0.9 running oauth-2.0 or openidConnectServer-1.0 server features is vulnerable to a denial of service attack conducted by an authenticated client. IBM X-Force ID: 184650.
CVE-2020-4731
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
IBM Aspera Web Application 1.9.14 PL1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 188055.
CVE-2020-4315
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
IBM Business Automation Content Analyzer on Cloud 1.0 does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. Attackers may be able to get the cookie values by sending a http:// link to a user or by planting this link in a site the user goes to. The cookie will be sent to the i...
CVE-2020-4579
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
IBM DataPower Gateway 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.12 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service by sending a specially crafted HTTP/2 request with invalid characters. IBM X-Force ID: 184438.
CVE-2020-4580
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-21
IBM DataPower Gateway 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.12 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service by sending a specially crafted a JSON request with invalid characters. IBM X-Force ID: 184439.