Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
First US Federal CISO Shares Security Lessons Learned
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
11/30/2017 | 8:32:12 PM
Re: Executives wait for "technologists" to lock their own front doors
@SchemaCzar: Not just executives -- even the very top executives. An MIT professor once told me a story of how a company sent out "fake" phishing emails to its employees as a test, and one of the people who clicked on the link was a C-suite executive. When asked why he clicked on the link, the C-suiter responded, "I wanted to see what would happen."
SchemaCzar
SchemaCzar,
User Rank: Strategist
11/30/2017 | 9:32:07 AM
Executives wait for "technologists" to lock their own front doors
Reading security news and the general news, I conclude that Touhill needs to talk tougher to executives.  There are too many stories of executives who can't be bothered to follow the same security policies that must be followed by others in the organization.  They are the highest-value person targets in the organization, and they often feel they can dump their own security on an underling, or worse, that security is the organization's problem rather than their personal responsibility.  I recently heard of a high-level VP in a large, regulated business who flat-out refused to follow password change, or even password complexity policy.  This was before password change policies were brought into question, but long after secure password managers were available that make password change and complexity requirements manageable.

Touhill is right that these executives think cybersecurity is a technology problem.  So is the physical security of their own homes: a technology problem.  If they treated home security the way they do organizational security, they wouldn't even lock their own front doors.
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
11/29/2017 | 8:30:55 PM
Basics
Reminds me of that old reality show "To Catch a Thief," which demonstrated to people how easy it was for burglars to break in and steal them blind in a matter of about ten minutes. Almost all the time, there was an unlocked window or unlocked door.

Same thing in cybersecurity. The bad guys don't go right to sophisticated techniques. They go to basic, common passwords and they go to recently announced zero-days to check for a lack of a patch.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Promise and Reality of Cloud Security
Cloud security has been part of the cybersecurity conversation for years but has been on the sidelines for most enterprises. The shift to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic and digital transformation projects have moved cloud infrastructure front-and-center as enterprises address the associated security risks. This report - a compilation of cutting-edge Black Hat research, in-depth Omdia analysis, and comprehensive Dark Reading reporting - explores how cloud security is rapidly evolving.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-46873
PUBLISHED: 2023-01-29
WireGuard, such as WireGuard 0.5.3 on Windows, does not fully account for the possibility that an adversary might be able to set a victim's system time to a future value, e.g., because unauthenticated NTP is used. This can lead to an outcome in which one static private key becomes permanently useles...
CVE-2023-0572
PUBLISHED: 2023-01-29
Unchecked Error Condition in GitHub repository froxlor/froxlor prior to 2.0.10.
CVE-2023-24065
PUBLISHED: 2023-01-29
NOSH 4a5cfdb allows stored XSS via the create user page. For example, a first name (of a physician, assistant, or billing user) can have a JavaScript payload that is executed upon visiting the /users/2/1 page. This may allow attackers to steal Protected Health Information because the product is for ...
CVE-2023-0565
PUBLISHED: 2023-01-29
Business Logic Errors in GitHub repository froxlor/froxlor prior to 2.0.10.
CVE-2023-0566
PUBLISHED: 2023-01-29
Static Code Injection in GitHub repository froxlor/froxlor prior to 2.0.10.