Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
'Bad Rabbit' Ransomware Attacks Rock Russia, Ukraine - and Beyond
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
10/30/2017 | 7:39:38 AM
Re: The person behind
Group IB out of Russia says it's "highly likely" the attackers behind Bad Rabbit are the same ones who launched NotPetya in June of 2017 against Ukraine energy, financial, and telecommunciations organizations.
Mr Phen375
50%
50%
Mr Phen375,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/28/2017 | 1:52:47 AM
The person behind
Anyone knows who is behind "Bad Rabbit" Ransomware?
jtemme
100%
0%
jtemme,
User Rank: Strategist
10/27/2017 | 3:30:52 PM
Re: Bad Rabbit Ransomware
Nice share!
jtemme
50%
50%
jtemme,
User Rank: Strategist
10/27/2017 | 3:20:25 PM
Re: Backup and Restore Protocols ONCE AGAIN
Right, the person I was replying to has deleted their posts so my reply may seem out of context but your comments about isolating systems is on piont, as well as your mention of prevention so the down time doesn't occur is the first place.
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
10/27/2017 | 1:27:53 PM
Re: Adobe Flash installer?
Flash just won't die. =/
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/27/2017 | 1:16:46 PM
Adobe Flash installer?
 

"No exploits were used, so the victim would have to manually execute the malware dropper, which pretends to be an Adobe Flash installer."

Does anybody still install Adobe Flash installer? I though it is already dead. I guess will see it for a while.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/27/2017 | 1:15:00 PM
Re: Bad Rabbit Ransomware
"Bad Rabbit Ransomware"

As like the others, ransomware players think that this is a very lucrative job, so it will never stop.
Dr.T
100%
0%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/27/2017 | 1:13:35 PM
Re: Backup and Restore Protocols ONCE AGAIN
"length of time this could cause widespread travel delays and numerous other problems"

I agree, that is one of the reasons is prevention strategies rather than recovery methods after the attack has to be focus.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/27/2017 | 1:11:40 PM
Re: Backup and Restore Protocols ONCE AGAIN
"Backup and Restore Protocols "
I think backup and restores is less likely a solution here, it needs to be isolated systems to avoid troubles after ransomware attack. To prevent it , that is another game.
Dr.T
100%
0%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
10/27/2017 | 1:08:08 PM
Kaspersky
Obviously Kaspersky is in the new lately a lot. They may be in a real trouble now.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
How a Manufacturing Firm Recovered from a Devastating Ransomware Attack
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5798
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Lack of correct bounds checking in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform an out of bounds memory read via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5799
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect inheritance of a new document's policy in Content Security Policy in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5800
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Insufficient policy enforcement in Blink in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to bypass content security policy via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5801
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect eliding of URLs in Omnibox in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page.
CVE-2019-5802
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-23
Incorrect handling of download origins in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 73.0.3683.75 allowed a remote attacker to perform domain spoofing via a crafted HTML page.