Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Russian Hackers Pilfered Data from NSA Contractor's Home Computer: Report
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Kelly Jackson Higgins
0%
100%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
10/6/2017 | 2:54:19 PM
Re: Whose fault?
And don't forget John Kelly's pwnd phone: https://www.darkreading.com/vulnerabilities---threats/john-kellys-personal-phone-compromised/d/d-id/1330068?

=O
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
10/6/2017 | 2:46:59 PM
Re: Whose fault?
You are quite right on email - and there are thousands MORE stories like it - plus ancient mainframe systems being unable to do GLOBAL email, only inernal email.  Reminds me of the old IBM PROFS system - internal email only used by IBM ONLY and nobody who used it had resume value OUTSIDE of IBM. 

And the most recent story about a hacker getting into White House email as Jared Kushner tool

AND the legendary, scare the hell out of you story about China hacking the NUCLEAR FOOTBALL once!!!
Kelly Jackson Higgins
0%
100%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
10/6/2017 | 2:36:50 PM
Re: Whose fault?
We just posted an updated report that it was actually an NSA employee, not a contractor. Either way, it's not okay that the nation's spy agency can't keep its classified data safe. Also, if you're going to go back to the email server story, you should also include the recent news about the Kushner & Ivanka Trump personal email accounts being used for White House business, and then being moved to the Trump organization's server. More examples of lax security for sensitive government operations.

Anyway, here's the latest on the NSA:

Russian Hackers Targeted NSA Employee's Home Computer

https://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/russian-hackers-targeted-nsa-employees-home-computer-/d/d-id/1330071?
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
10/6/2017 | 1:59:03 PM
Whose fault?
Contractor --- using a "home" computer without, probable, good security protocols for NSA based high secret work.  What is wrong here?  WHOEVER put the contractor IN there is at fault for not stressing YOU DO NOT DO GOVERMNENT WORK AT HOME!!!  Again, almost Hillary's famous server.  Without at least high end firewalls and such --- well, no wonder it was hacked and HAVING NSA DATA  ON IT is a serious, legal breach indeed.  Do not blame Kapersky on this one. 
<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Manchester United Suffers Cyberattack
Dark Reading Staff 11/23/2020
As 'Anywhere Work' Evolves, Security Will Be Key Challenge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/23/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: He hits the gong anytime he sees someone click on an email link.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-7779
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
All versions of package djvalidator are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) by sending crafted invalid emails - for example, [email protected]-----------------------------------------------------------!.
CVE-2020-7778
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
This affects the package systeminformation before 4.30.2. The attacker can overwrite the properties and functions of an object, which can lead to executing OS commands.
CVE-2020-29128
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
petl before 1.68, in some configurations, allows resolution of entities in an XML document.
CVE-2020-27251
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
A heap overflow vulnerability exists within FactoryTalk Linx Version 6.11 and prior. This vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to send malicious port ranges, which could result in remote code execution.
CVE-2020-27253
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
A flaw exists in the Ingress/Egress checks routine of FactoryTalk Linx Version 6.11 and prior. This vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to specifically craft a malicious packet resulting in a denial-of-service condition on the device.