Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
A Call for New Voices on the Security Conference Circuit
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
SDiver
50%
50%
SDiver,
User Rank: Strategist
9/7/2017 | 9:30:42 PM
Suggestions?
Great article, Lysa,

 

I've spoken at local security conferences for the past seven years and would like to expand into the larger conferences.  Have any suggestions?  It seems that conferences come and go before I ever learn about them.
LysaMyers
50%
50%
LysaMyers,
User Rank: Author
9/16/2017 | 1:01:43 AM
Re: Suggestions?
Sorry for the delay, it appears the first version of my comment disappeared into the ether! 

As for bigger conferences, the two that come most readily to mind are RSA and BlackHat/Defcon. But between those two extremes, there are countless dozens or hundreds of options. There are conferences that focus on defense, others on offense. There are some that are more corporate, some that are more informal. There are some that focus on specific aspects of security like usability, privacy, IoT, Anti-malware, etc. There are some that are geared towards particular demographics or regions of the country. And there are even a surprising number geared towards specific business verticals like Healthcare or Education. There are a ton of different cons to check out now: Google can actually be helpful for this, as can following coverage from Dark Reading, or security folk on Twitter. 
geriatric
50%
50%
geriatric,
User Rank: Moderator
9/15/2017 | 9:05:14 AM
Perhaps Some Tips?
I have been thinking about doing a talk for some time now. I submitted an abstract to a security conference, but it was rejected (READ: ignored). So I really don't know what I did wrong. What about some tips from those who have cracked the elite circle for us wannabes?
LysaMyers
50%
50%
LysaMyers,
User Rank: Author
9/15/2017 | 3:25:48 PM
Re: Perhaps Some Tips?
"What you did wrong" may be as simple as "submitted to a conference with an overwhelming number of applicants".

Larry Zeltser has posted a list of tips that really sums it up for me.

https://zeltser.com/submit-security-conference-proposal/

The few times I've been on the reviewing end of the equation, the most important things I looked for in session abstracts were a topic that has some new or interesting angle/subject, and an abstract that clearly illustrated that they had a clear plan for what they would be covering.

Another thing to do is to find people who are on conference selection committees and ask for their unvarnished opinion on your submission. They may see issues that might be less intuitive to those of us who haven't had to wade through a sea of session abstracts.


Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-4095
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 158015.
CVE-2019-4244
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
IBM SmartCloud Analytics 1.3.1 through 1.3.5 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized information and unrestricted control over Zookeeper installations due to missing authentication. IBM X-Force ID: 159518.
CVE-2019-4521
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
Platform System Manager in IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3 is potentially vulnerable to CVS Injection. A remote attacker could execute arbitrary commands on the system, caused by improper validation of csv file contents. IBM X-Force ID: 165179.
CVE-2019-4663
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 171245...
CVE-2019-19251
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
The Last.fm desktop app (Last.fm Scrobbler) through 2.1.39 on macOS makes HTTP requests that include an API key without the use of SSL/TLS. Although there is an Enable SSL option, it is disabled by default, and cleartext requests are made as soon as the app starts.