Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Is Public Sector Cybersecurity Adequate?
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
imispgh
0%
100%
imispgh,
User Rank: Strategist
9/8/2017 | 4:27:39 PM
Lockheed Whistleblower-(CyberArk) - Most organizations avoid key best cybersecurity practices
Privileged Account Security – The massive hole in most organizations cybersecurity. Why isn't it being addressed?  Lack of Courage

 

Organizations are avoiding this key best practice on purpose!!!!!!!!!!

 

My name is Michael DeKort. I am a former systems engineer, engineering and program manager for Lockheed Martin. I worked in aircraft simulation, the Aegis Weapon System, NORAD and on C4ISR for the US Coast Guard and DHS.  I also worked in Commercial IT. Including at CyberArk and in banking, healthcare and insurance.  I also received the IEEE Barus Ethics Award for whistleblowing regarding the DHS/USCG Deepwater program post 9/11.

https://www.thenation.com/article/will-botched-coast-guard-contract-come-back-bite-james-comey

 

The overwhelming majority of companies and government organizations are avoiding the most critical cyber-security practice of all. Dealing with privileged account security. It's the biggest dirty secret in cybersecurity. Which is extremely unfortunate because virtually every hack on record was accomplished by someone gaining access to a privileged account then moving through the system. This usually occurs due to a successful phishing expedition. (Of which 22% are successful. Keep in mind only one is needed).

 

Of the small fraction of companies that even deal with this area and purchase products few of them actually use the products they purchase properly. Many install them then slow roll actually using them to any significant degree for decades. Often this is meant to purposefully deceive C-Suite and regulators. This puts everyone at risk.

 

Here is how bad things are. CMU CERT is the premier authority on cyber-security best practices. Especially for DoD. I found out that CMU CERT has no solution for themselves in this area. They actually defer to CMU IT for their own security and they have no solution in this area. Shouldn't the organization responsible for telling others what best practice is use best practices for its own security?

 

Why is this happening? These products inadvertently expose several huge best practice gaps. Examples include having 4X more accounts than people, non-encrypted password files or spreadsheets, emails with passwords and software programs with passwords hard coded in them and many not knowing where they all are. And having local admin permissions available on laptops and end points and not knowing where they all are either.

 

Why don't these folks address this? Because it means pushing the culture to change bad habits and admit to their executives and boards they even existed in the first place. Governing bodies and regulators mean well but they don't help much. This is because the relevant regulations, SOC, HiTrust etc are too trusting and don't specify enough detail. This gives organizations far too much room to wiggle. This all results in most companies and organizations not utilizing best practices or readily available of off the shelf products that can significantly reduce the threat.

 

This is not a technical issue. It's one of Courage. Courage to admit the root causes exist, To deal with the culture and lead them to fix them. To not sacrifice customers to protect egos or let the bean counters justify it's cheaper to harm customers than the bottom line. 
imispgh
0%
100%
imispgh,
User Rank: Strategist
9/8/2017 | 4:27:37 PM
Lockheed Whistleblower-(CyberArk) - Most organizations avoid key best cybersecurity practices
Privileged Account Security – The massive hole in most organizations cybersecurity. Why isn't it being addressed?  Lack of Courage

 

Organizations are avoiding this key best practice on purpose!!!!!!!!!!

 

My name is Michael DeKort. I am a former systems engineer, engineering and program manager for Lockheed Martin. I worked in aircraft simulation, the Aegis Weapon System, NORAD and on C4ISR for the US Coast Guard and DHS.  I also worked in Commercial IT. Including at CyberArk and in banking, healthcare and insurance.  I also received the IEEE Barus Ethics Award for whistleblowing regarding the DHS/USCG Deepwater program post 9/11.

https://www.thenation.com/article/will-botched-coast-guard-contract-come-back-bite-james-comey

 

The overwhelming majority of companies and government organizations are avoiding the most critical cyber-security practice of all. Dealing with privileged account security. It's the biggest dirty secret in cybersecurity. Which is extremely unfortunate because virtually every hack on record was accomplished by someone gaining access to a privileged account then moving through the system. This usually occurs due to a successful phishing expedition. (Of which 22% are successful. Keep in mind only one is needed).

 

Of the small fraction of companies that even deal with this area and purchase products few of them actually use the products they purchase properly. Many install them then slow roll actually using them to any significant degree for decades. Often this is meant to purposefully deceive C-Suite and regulators. This puts everyone at risk.

 

Here is how bad things are. CMU CERT is the premier authority on cyber-security best practices. Especially for DoD. I found out that CMU CERT has no solution for themselves in this area. They actually defer to CMU IT for their own security and they have no solution in this area. Shouldn't the organization responsible for telling others what best practice is use best practices for its own security?

 

Why is this happening? These products inadvertently expose several huge best practice gaps. Examples include having 4X more accounts than people, non-encrypted password files or spreadsheets, emails with passwords and software programs with passwords hard coded in them and many not knowing where they all are. And having local admin permissions available on laptops and end points and not knowing where they all are either.

 

Why don't these folks address this? Because it means pushing the culture to change bad habits and admit to their executives and boards they even existed in the first place. Governing bodies and regulators mean well but they don't help much. This is because the relevant regulations, SOC, HiTrust etc are too trusting and don't specify enough detail. This gives organizations far too much room to wiggle. This all results in most companies and organizations not utilizing best practices or readily available of off the shelf products that can significantly reduce the threat.

 

This is not a technical issue. It's one of Courage. Courage to admit the root causes exist, To deal with the culture and lead them to fix them. To not sacrifice customers to protect egos or let the bean counters justify it's cheaper to harm customers than the bottom line. 
REISEN1955
0%
100%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
9/8/2017 | 12:36:36 PM
Re: Sadly, the article title is not a joke
True indeed - basics are a good place to start, usually the ONLY place to start.  The trick is that now government, public houses are under orders for a massive re-vamp to bring them out of the 1970s and 80s to the twenty first century and THAT'S THE HARD PART.  Piling security and cyber on top of that would tax the mind of even the most able cyber specialist these days.  
jjcouch
50%
50%
jjcouch,
User Rank: Author
9/8/2017 | 10:35:28 AM
Re: Sadly, the article title is not a joke
Thanks for your comment - I completely agree. I went more in-depth originally, but I'm limited by the length of the article I can post so I had to cut it down. The issues that government security organizations face is significant and can't be easily solved - my main point, I guess, is just that these organizations need to get back to the basics and just do "leading practices." While it won't fix everything, it is a huge step in the right direction.
SchemaCzar
50%
50%
SchemaCzar,
User Rank: Strategist
9/8/2017 | 9:29:34 AM
Sadly, the article title is not a joke
Nor do you even need to read the text to know the answer.  The statistics given are sobering confirmation of the bleak hypotheses security professionals like myself have drawn.  I wish it had gone a bit deeper before turning into a "win one for the Gipper" cheer.
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
9/8/2017 | 8:02:17 AM
Equifax answered my own post
Presuming that Equifax hack was due to an outsouricng of IT ---- YES!!!  They outsourced support to good old true blue IBM - the once great firm that has multiple outsourced failures, lawsuits and blown data centers around the world.  (They are not welcome in Australia anymore).
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
9/7/2017 | 3:07:41 PM
Private or Public?
Does not matter to the degree that both tend to farm out IT staffing and controls to CSRA (what used to be part of CSC to the public sector) and good old Infosys, Tata, Wipro, IBM et al.  The outsourcing firms do NOT have client's best interest at heart.  I have come from a Wipro shop and it was a horror show.  What outsourcing firms DO care about is INVOICE MANAGEMENT and cybersecurity??? HAHAHAHA not a tinker's damn of care.  Oh lip sevice of course but you don't get great talent through outsourcing rules, protocols and staffing.   Some, yes a few individuals, in an outsourced shop do know their stuff.  They are generally rare.  And over-worked as a result.  

Big government however is reported to driving some very very old hardware, going back to the 1970s (such as a nuclear command and contrl which should scare the hell out of anybody).  Nobody is writing malware for IBM System/370 systems anymore but they are probably easy to crack into and THAT should be frightening indeed. 


Stop Defending Everything
Kevin Kurzawa, Senior Information Security Auditor,  2/12/2020
Small Business Security: 5 Tips on How and Where to Start
Mike Puglia, Chief Strategy Officer at Kaseya,  2/13/2020
5 Common Errors That Allow Attackers to Go Undetected
Matt Middleton-Leal, General Manager and Chief Security Strategist, Netwrix,  2/12/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-7505
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
Stack-based buffer overflow in the gif_next_LZW function in libnsgif.c in Libnsgif 0.1.2 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted LZW stream in a GIF file.
CVE-2015-7567
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
SQL injection vulnerability in Yeager CMS 1.2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the "passwordreset&token" parameter.
CVE-2012-0718
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
IBM Tivoli Endpoint Manager 8 does not set the HttpOnly flag on cookies.
CVE-2019-10791
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
promise-probe before 0.10.0 allows remote attackers to perform a command injection attack. The file, outputFile and options functions can be controlled by users without any sanitization.
CVE-2009-5146
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.