Comments
Tuesday: Spammers' Favorite Day of the Week
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
jolinamcconaughey
50%
50%
jolinamcconaughey,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/25/2017 | 6:45:27 AM
Re: Work Week Driven
AMAZING
andrewsymond
50%
50%
andrewsymond,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/25/2017 | 5:39:52 AM
Re: Work Week Driven
yeah
warrenzephaniah
50%
50%
warrenzephaniah,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/25/2017 | 5:37:42 AM
Re: Work Week Driven
lol
brucebrennan
50%
50%
brucebrennan,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/25/2017 | 1:58:31 AM
Re: Work Week Driven
yeah
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
8/23/2017 | 7:43:02 AM
Re: Work Week Driven
@Joe, I definitely know people like that as well. As you stated, it would be interesting to survey employees outside of work email habits.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
8/22/2017 | 5:41:09 PM
Re: Work Week Driven
@Ryan: I'm curious to know some data on that. I know some people who are exactly like that -- and others who are "always on" -- checking their work email often as soon as they get up in the morning (even if it's a day off).
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
8/22/2017 | 5:40:13 PM
Re: Work Week Driven
I'm not so sure about the "puffery" of it considering the evolution of increasingly more "intelligent" networks. It may, potentially, make sense one day, as we work toward true SONs (self-organized networks), to have heightened strictness of certain measures during times when the network is more prone to attack.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
8/22/2017 | 5:38:43 PM
Online activity
This is insightful considering that this seems to track with social-media engagement -- which, perforce, is also linked to levels of online activity. Tuesday is typically the biggest day for online engagement, in general.
REISEN1955
0%
100%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
8/22/2017 | 10:14:16 AM
Re: Work Week Driven
True enough - the threats are a 24-7-365 reality so this is really a puff piece.
xanthan99
50%
50%
xanthan99,
User Rank: Strategist
8/22/2017 | 9:43:48 AM
New information?
This doesn't seem like new information in terms of when Spam is sent, I could have derived this report from scanning my inbox.  In addition, even after reading the IBM source article, it isn't exactly clear what the originator information means.  Does India lead in sending Spam around the world or as the article implies, Spam tends to be sent from the target email's country of origin which would seem to infer that Indians receive more Spam than any other nationality.  And by quite a large margin.  If this is the case, given how much US offshore development is sourced from India an interesting article would be to use this data to start an examination of the state of security in the Indian Tech sector.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>


What We Talk About When We Talk About Risk
Jack Jones, Chairman, FAIR Institute,  7/11/2018
Ticketmaster Breach Part of Massive Payment Card Hacking Campaign
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  7/10/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14084
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-16
An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for MKCB, an Ethereum token. If the owner sets the value of sellPrice to a large number in setPrices() then the "amount * sellPrice" will cause an integer overflow in sell().
CVE-2018-14085
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-16
An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for UserWallet 0x0a7bca9FB7AfF26c6ED8029BB6f0F5D291587c42, an Ethereum token. First, suppose that the owner adds the evil contract address to his sweepers. The evil contract looks like this: contract Exploit { uint public start; function swe...
CVE-2018-14086
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-16
An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for SingaporeCoinOrigin (SCO), an Ethereum token. The contract has an integer overflow. If the owner sets the value of sellPrice to a large number in setPrices() then the "amount * sellPrice" will cause an integer overflow in sell(...
CVE-2018-14087
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-16
An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for EUC (EUC), an Ethereum token. The contract has an integer overflow. If the owner sets the value of buyPrice to a large number in setPrices() then the "msg.value * buyPrice" will cause an integer overflow in the fallback functio...
CVE-2018-14088
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-16
An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for STeX White List (STE(WL)), an Ethereum token. The contract has an integer overflow. If the owner sets the value of amount to a large number then the "amount * 1000000000000000" will cause an integer overflow in withdrawToFounde...