Comments
What Women in Cybersecurity Really Think About Their Careers
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
8/7/2017 | 3:28:50 PM
Re: Are we equal yet?
@SchemaCzar It's likely that you haven't seen "anti-woman prejudice" because you haven't experienced it firsthand like many women in this industry do. The goal of Wong's report was to highlight how women who are in this industry feel about their jobs and their roles in the industry despite implicit biases they and minorities face on a regular basis. It's not meant to be a jab at men or "old-boy exclusiveness" as you described, but instead to be honest and open about these experiences and what can be done to foster a more inclusive environment. Awareness of biases we all have is key to opening the door for more talent in the industry.

The report had a positive spin indeed because many women are proud of the work they do and the contributions they make to the industry. That should speak for itself on how they are an important "subgroup" of the security profession. 
GonzSTL
100%
0%
GonzSTL,
User Rank: Ninja
8/7/2017 | 1:53:35 PM
Re: Are we equal yet?

I was on a panel a few weeks ago in a discussion about Diversity in IT that included, besides myself, 3 women: 2 CIOs and a managing principal for an IT staffing firm. The discussion was quite eye opening, and a lot of it centered on a person's life balances as a huge factor in choosing their profession. The question was not really whether or not we are equal, but instead revolved more around the circumstances that heavily influenced decisions, and what would be a better fit in their family life. Although I readily admit that IT security (really, IT in general) has since the beginning been a male dominated discipline, I'm not sure that disparaging attitudes towards women in IT are prevalent and cause their lack of representation.

I am glad that the author touched on the pipeline problem. We must find a way to inspire girls and young women to consider a career in cybersecurity (really, IT in general). In the USA, almost 47% of the workforce are women, and if only 11% in the (cybersecurity) industry are women, then we have a serious issue because we are missing out on a very large group of people. I'm not saying that we must necessarily have 47 %, but surely something larger than 11%. Peer and societal pressures play such a heavy role on career selections, and those are the toughest to overcome. It would be good for women in cybersecurity to share their stories so that women can be inspired to pursue that career. Those stories should be heard by girls at an early age, as stereotypical images are formed at earlier ages these days.

SchemaCzar
50%
50%
SchemaCzar,
User Rank: Strategist
8/7/2017 | 12:34:05 PM
Are we equal yet?
I'm really not sure why I'm still seeing articles about women as an important subgroup in this profession because of their gender.  In my entire professional life, I've seen only a handful of real anti-woman prejudice events and a ton of scrupulous even-handedness. I am glad that Wong seems to see "improvement," because sometimes  articles with such topics can seem like veiled accusations of old-boy exclusiveness.  But this article still doesn't help me at all in my security work and research.

I will say this:we need a boatload of additional security professionals whatever their demographics.


White House Cybersecurity Strategy at a Crossroads
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  7/17/2018
The Fundamental Flaw in Security Awareness Programs
Ira Winkler, CISSP, President, Secure Mentem,  7/19/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-14492
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-21
Tenda AC7 through V15.03.06.44_CN, AC9 through V15.03.05.19(6318)_CN, and AC10 through V15.03.06.23_CN devices have a Stack-based Buffer Overflow via a long limitSpeed or limitSpeedup parameter to an unspecified /goform URI.
CVE-2018-3770
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
A path traversal exists in markdown-pdf version <9.0.0 that allows a user to insert a malicious html code that can result in reading the local files.
CVE-2018-3771
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
An XSS in statics-server <= 0.0.9 can be used via injected iframe in the filename when statics-server displays directory index in the browser.
CVE-2018-5065
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have a Use-after-free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.
CVE-2018-5066
PUBLISHED: 2018-07-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader 2018.011.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30080 and earlier, and 2015.006.30418 and earlier versions have an Out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.