Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
The Case for Crowdsourcing Security Buying Decisions
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
josh@idrra.com
50%
50%
[email protected],
User Rank: Apprentice
7/6/2017 | 12:56:13 PM
Re: Humans as "early-warning systems"
Interesting perspective - thank you Joe.
josh@idrra.com
50%
50%
[email protected],
User Rank: Apprentice
7/6/2017 | 12:54:02 PM
Re: What about IT Central Station?
Thank you for the comment.  I have a few ideas here.  If you would like to reach out to me privately, I would be happy to discuss further.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
7/6/2017 | 12:33:33 PM
Humans as "early-warning systems"
As things stand now, when humans are your "early-warning system," it's generally already too late.

Thus, getting people involved in these ways early, before something goes *way* wrong (so wrong that they would seek IT/InfoSec teams out on their own), can be immeasurably helpful. I absolutely agree with the notion that "more eyes" can help here from a practical point of view.

Of course, just don't go overboard with it. Invite input, bear in mind that all users are stakeholders, but know where the buck stops.
brendonjwilson
50%
50%
brendonjwilson,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/3/2017 | 2:00:45 PM
What about IT Central Station?
Totally agree with the article on the need. Bootstrapping a new two-sided marketplace for sharing information can be a hard problem to solve in a scalable fashion.

I did come across IT Central Station two years ago, but the information on the site was pretty thin on the ground, as was the catalog of products covered. I'm not sure if it's gotten better.

Anyone have any experience with IT Central Station?
josh@idrra.com
50%
50%
[email protected],
User Rank: Apprentice
6/30/2017 | 12:05:56 PM
Re: Crowdsourcing and Open Sourcing Security
Thank you, Christian, great comment.  Very much appreciate your thoughts on this.  I have some ideas here -- please feel free to reach out to me privately, and I'd be happy to discuss further.
RetiredUser
50%
50%
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
6/30/2017 | 11:55:59 AM
Crowdsourcing and Open Sourcing Security
You don't have to convince me.  Coming from the FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) world, I'm all about open and accessible metrics, code transparency, peer collaboration and "show me the code" clarity.  But in drawing that comparison I can say right away that there will be huge hurdles.  It took a long time for FOSS to be ubiquitous to where the average computer user knew what GNU/Linux was, or could name more than one of the top 10 popular FOSS languages.  As another DR reader noted, PGP has been around a long time, and we FOSSers have been doing "security" for decades.  But that's us.  The practice of secure coding and global collaborative development has been fairly steady and flat out works.

It would be nice to see a stab at the solutions, though.  You nailed the reasons why we aren't there yet when it comes to security for the average user as developed, support and delivered by the "megacorps", let alone Enterprise security.  Could the answer be somewhere in the FOSS story, I wonder?

 

 


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 11/19/2020
The Yellow Brick Road to Risk Management
Andrew Lowe, Senior Information Security Consultant, TalaTek,  11/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: He hits the gong anytime he sees someone click on an email link.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-7779
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
All versions of package djvalidator are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) by sending crafted invalid emails - for example, [email protected]-----------------------------------------------------------!.
CVE-2020-7778
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
This affects the package systeminformation before 4.30.2. The attacker can overwrite the properties and functions of an object, which can lead to executing OS commands.
CVE-2020-29128
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
petl before 1.68, in some configurations, allows resolution of entities in an XML document.
CVE-2020-27251
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
A heap overflow vulnerability exists within FactoryTalk Linx Version 6.11 and prior. This vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to send malicious port ranges, which could result in remote code execution.
CVE-2020-27253
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-26
A flaw exists in the Ingress/Egress checks routine of FactoryTalk Linx Version 6.11 and prior. This vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to specifically craft a malicious packet resulting in a denial-of-service condition on the device.