Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Security in the Cloud: Pitfalls and Potential of CASB Systems
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
PatrickF934
50%
50%
PatrickF934,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/16/2017 | 3:07:16 PM
Re: CASBs can, in fact, take action on the issues they highlight.
Thanks for your response to the article. I work with Tim at Evident.io, and while I understand your points, I want to clarify some things. Taking action is not sending the data off to a non-CASB product and throwing the issue over the wall.  Sure, if you are a legacy man-in-the-middle approach to control you can attempt to take action, but architecturally this would fail when cloud services are accessed outside the networks behind the CASB solution. "Public Cloud" is exactly that... unconstrained access from anywhere in the world. This is where the CASB approach fails. No CASB player has full API coverage for public cloud and therefore cannot lay claim that they are true hybrid coverage solutions, much less process the environments in real time and mitigate risk across the overall attack surface. Integrations with other point products is a referral network, and not core CASB remediation capability.
nets651
0%
100%
nets651,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/8/2017 | 10:32:43 AM
CASBs can, in fact, take action on the issues they highlight.
The comment by the gentleman from Evident.Io is plainly inaccurate. Multi-mode CASBs have gone far beyond Discovery for many years and can take a multitude of actions on anomalies, threats detected, DLP violations etc... both inline and out-of-band, including access control, alerting, quarantine, blocking, coaching, redirecting, encrypting/tokenizing and more. These actions can be taken across all modes, from out-of-band APIs to reverse proxy or full forward proxy.  They can be integrated with existing DLP, UBA, Threat Detection and IR solutions for end-to-end closed-loop remediation. 


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/2/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9498
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
Apache Guacamole 1.1.0 and older may mishandle pointers involved inprocessing data received via RDP static virtual channels. If a userconnects to a malicious or compromised RDP server, a series ofspecially-crafted PDUs could result in memory corruption, possiblyallowing arbitrary code to be executed...
CVE-2020-3282
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition, Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service, and Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attack...
CVE-2020-5909
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, when users run the command displayed in NGINX Controller user interface (UI) to fetch the agent installer, the server TLS certificate is not verified.
CVE-2020-5910
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the Neural Autonomic Transport System (NATS) messaging services in use by the NGINX Controller do not require any form of authentication, so any successful connection would be authorized.
CVE-2020-5911
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-02
In versions 3.0.0-3.5.0, 2.0.0-2.9.0, and 1.0.1, the NGINX Controller installer starts the download of Kubernetes packages from an HTTP URL On Debian/Ubuntu system.