Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-45786PUBLISHED: 2023-02-04
There are issues with the AGE drivers for Golang and Python that enable SQL injections to occur. This impacts AGE for PostgreSQL 11 & AGE for PostgreSQL 12, all versions up-to-and-including 1.1.0, when using those drivers. The fix is to update to the latest Golang and Python drivers in addition ...
CVE-2023-22849PUBLISHED: 2023-02-04
An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') [CWE-79] vulnerability in Sling App CMS version 1.1.4 and prior may allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack in multiple features. Upgrade to Apache Sling Ap...
CVE-2023-25193PUBLISHED: 2023-02-04hb-ot-layout-gsubgpos.hh in HarfBuzz through 6.0.0 allows attackers to trigger O(n^2) growth via consecutive marks during the process of looking back for base glyphs when attaching marks.
CVE-2023-0676PUBLISHED: 2023-02-04Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected in GitHub repository phpipam/phpipam prior to 1.5.1.
CVE-2023-0677PUBLISHED: 2023-02-04Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Reflected in GitHub repository phpipam/phpipam prior to v1.5.1.
User Rank: Strategist
3/31/2017 | 4:31:33 PM
The proposition that a "30%" failure rate is a realiable benchmark for a universal catch-all benchmark for "traditional AV" - whatever that is nowadays - sounds pretty high to me.
And that "30%" is "new"? "Zero-day" ?
Presumably that 30% includes stuff with the tiniest of code deviations from a long established malware family? Is that really 'new' ?
There's certainly the core of a decent case here. I'm good with that.
Seems to me there's a bit of 'amplification' going on as well, though.