Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Businesses Fear Brand Damage More Than Security Breaches
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Survivalindeed
100%
0%
Survivalindeed,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/23/2017 | 8:57:59 AM
Re: This is tactical info
Yes For Sure
Sammy324
50%
50%
Sammy324,
User Rank: Strategist
2/6/2017 | 2:30:32 PM
Re: This is tactical info
Can't add anything to that, thanks. :D
Shantaram
50%
50%
Shantaram,
User Rank: Ninja
2/6/2017 | 6:21:20 AM
Re: 192.168.0.1
I agreed with you! THanks for this post!
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
2/5/2017 | 12:57:08 PM
Re: Great research! Much more education of business leaders on the other damages of security breaches is needed.
@David: More to the point, what would be helpful is exposing enterprises to more and better research on the costs of each negative aspect realized from a security breach.  In some cases, brand damage may in fact be the costliest thing to worry about -- while in many cases, it may not be.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
2/5/2017 | 12:56:02 PM
Not THAT unsensible
It's not that unsensible.  It's a bit like saying a person fears pain more than they fear being set on fire.  There are lots of ways one can realize pain, and there are far more negative consequences to pain that being set on fire carries -- but it's one of the most obvious and one of the most devastating.

So too with brand damage.  There are lots of ways brand damage can happen, and lots of bad stuff that comes from security breaches, but it appears that most businesses have determined that the costliest of the costly consequences of security breaches is that of brand damage.

And it's hard not to find common ground with that point -- particularly if the breach happened because you/your organization did something stupid and/or ill-advised (TJX, Target, and Home Depot come to mind).
DavidK194
100%
0%
DavidK194,
User Rank: Author
2/3/2017 | 10:31:58 AM
Great research! Much more education of business leaders on the other damages of security breaches is needed.
Enjoyed the article.  Often reputation and brand damage is what I hear when I speak with customers.  Much more must be done to educate our enterprises of other damaging effects of breaches.  Intellectual property loss is huge among corporations as well as lost business opportunities due to competitors using intel gathered to out bid them.

 


Florida Town Pays $600K to Ransomware Operators
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/20/2019
Pledges to Not Pay Ransomware Hit Reality
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  6/21/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12949
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
In pfSense 2.4.4-p2 and 2.4.4-p3, if it is possible to trick an authenticated administrator into clicking on a button on a phishing page, an attacker can leverage XSS to upload arbitrary executable code, via diag_command.php and rrd_fetch_json.php (timePeriod parameter), to a server. Then, the remot...
CVE-2019-12957
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
In Xpdf 4.01.01, a buffer over-read could be triggered in FoFiType1C::convertToType1 in fofi/FoFiType1C.cc when the index number is larger than the charset array bounds. It can, for example, be triggered by sending a crafted PDF document to the pdftops tool. It allows an attacker to use a crafted pd...
CVE-2019-12958
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
In Xpdf 4.01.01, a heap-based buffer over-read could be triggered in FoFiType1C::convertToType0 in fofi/FoFiType1C.cc when it is trying to access the second privateDicts array element, because the privateDicts array has only one element allocated.
CVE-2019-12951
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-24
An issue was discovered in Mongoose before 6.15. The parse_mqtt() function in mg_mqtt.c has a critical heap-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2019-10689
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-24
VVX products using UCS software version 5.9.2 and earlier with Better Together over Ethernet Connector (BToE) application version 3.9.1 and earlier provides insufficient authentication between the BToE application and the BToE component, resulting in leakage of sensitive information.