Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Database Security
Authentication
Mobile
Privacy
Compliance
Careers and People
Identity & Access Management
Security Monitoring
Advanced Threats
Insider Threats
Vulnerability Management
Comments
The Sorry State Of Cybersecurity Awareness Training
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
KatherineM394
KatherineM394,
 User Rank: Apprentice
6/14/2017 | 6:28:24 PM
Cybersecurity Awareness Training for U.S.
Great point! CyberTraining 365 is my recommendation for U.S. based companies. They're accredited and aligned with NICE (framework outlined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology) as well as accredited by EC-Council and partnerships with industry experts. They do both technical and awareness training.  https://www.cybertraining365.com/cybertraining/Home 
LindsayCybSafe
LindsayCybSafe,
 User Rank: Strategist
5/24/2017 | 9:08:48 AM
Mouse clicks = sword of Damocles
Joe makes the good point - there needs to be audit-friendly, quantifiable evidence of employee cyber training to cover the CIO. Prefeferably, the most accrediated entreprise training package on offer. 

For the UK, Cybsafe does this - but for the US market I'm less sure. 
tfdj
tfdj,
 User Rank: Apprentice
1/27/2017 | 5:23:13 PM
Re: Don't flog the peasantry.
PMerry,

Thanks for the feedback.

You are correct, the Board of Directors as well as senior management need to be held accountable as well.  Unfortunately, this is a "top down" initiative and must have senior level support in order for it to be successful. 

Again, thanks for the post, it is most appreciated.

Cheers.
tfdj
tfdj,
 User Rank: Apprentice
1/27/2017 | 5:17:21 PM
Re: Great Article and spot on
ZSCHULER,

Thank you for the kind words, much appreciated!

Cheers!
tfdj
tfdj,
 User Rank: Apprentice
1/23/2017 | 5:29:05 PM
Re: Don't flog the peasantry.
Joe,

Thanks for your reply!  I appreciate the feedback!

To be clear, I'm not suggesting that the only way that things can be done is by "flogging the peasantry", quite the contrary.  What I'm suggesting is that companies place the same amount of emphasis on ensuring that information security training is taking place as they do, with say, their office supply policy.  I've seen companies where an employee is taken to task for violating the office supply policy, yet when they don't complete their information security training, there's no consequence.

You are correct in that it needs to start at the top, because without C-Suite backing, the training program is more than likely going to falter and fail out of the gate.  Further, if the employees see that there are no repercussions from senior management then, by proxy, they are given carte blanche to ignore the training.

Cheers,

Tom 
pmerry
pmerry,
 User Rank: Apprentice
1/19/2017 | 9:13:19 PM
Re: Don't flog the peasantry.
You're right. It's about accountability. If the leaders don't hold themselves accountable, they can't expect the rest of the organization to. A top down approach is needed for a successful cyber security training program and proper implementation and practice of policy.
zschuler
zschuler,
 User Rank: Author
1/17/2017 | 8:20:09 PM
Great Article and spot on
The Author clearly knows what he is talking about.  There is actually a 3rd party service called NINJIO that seems to meet all of his requirements.
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli,
 User Rank: Ninja
1/14/2017 | 2:51:36 PM
Don't flog the peasantry.
Well put, but let me counter:

1) If something is everybody's job, it's nobody's job.  If employees whose primary tasks are to answer telephones or to do data entry or construct marketing plans or whatever engage in a cybersecurity failing, while there should be some remediation, instead of flogging the peasants, I propose punishing the generals -- and calling the CIO/CISO/etc. on the carpet -- because, ultimately, it's their failing.  If the front-line employees aren't properly trained and properly acting on that training, it's the trainers' fault and the fault of the people responsible for that training to begin with.

2) In a heavy-handed "flog-the-peasants" environment, employees -- even managers -- will be reluctant at best to come forward if they violate a policy that then results in a potential data compromise.  Consequently, there needs to be appropriate policy for this that doesn't use the stick so much as the carrot.  (I've written on this, for example, here: enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netsysm/minimize-shadow-it-damage-by-encouraging-self-reporting.html ).


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The 10 Most Impactful Types of Vulnerabilities for Enterprises Today
Managing system vulnerabilities is one of the old est - and most frustrating - security challenges that enterprise defenders face. Every software application and hardware device ships with intrinsic flaws - flaws that, if critical enough, attackers can exploit from anywhere in the world. It's crucial that defenders take stock of what areas of the tech stack have the most emerging, and critical, vulnerabilities they must manage. It's not just zero day vulnerabilities. Consider that CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog lists vulnerabilitlies in widely used applications that are "actively exploited," and most of them are flaws that were discovered several years ago and have been fixed. There are also emerging vulnerabilities in 5G networks, cloud infrastructure, Edge applications, and firmwares to consider.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2023-1142
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
In Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5, an attacker could use URL decoding to retrieve system files, credentials, and bypass authentication resulting in privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-1143
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
In Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5, an attacker could use Lua scripts, which could allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2023-1144
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5 contains an improper access control vulnerability in which an attacker can use the Device-Gateway service and bypass authorization, which could result in privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-1145
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5 are affected by a deserialization vulnerability targeting the Device-DataCollect service, which could allow deserialization of requests prior to authentication, resulting in remote code execution.
CVE-2023-1655
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository gpac/gpac prior to 2.4.0.