Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-30333PUBLISHED: 2022-05-09RARLAB UnRAR before 6.12 on Linux and UNIX allows directory traversal to write to files during an extract (aka unpack) operation, as demonstrated by creating a ~/.ssh/authorized_keys file. NOTE: WinRAR and Android RAR are unaffected.
CVE-2022-23066PUBLISHED: 2022-05-09
In Solana rBPF versions 0.2.26 and 0.2.27 are affected by Incorrect Calculation which is caused by improper implementation of sdiv instruction. This can lead to the wrong execution path, resulting in huge loss in specific cases. For example, the result of a sdiv instruction may decide whether to tra...
CVE-2022-28463PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08ImageMagick 7.1.0-27 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow.
CVE-2022-28470PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08marcador package in PyPI 0.1 through 0.13 included a code-execution backdoor.
CVE-2022-1620PUBLISHED: 2022-05-08NULL Pointer Dereference in function vim_regexec_string at regexp.c:2729 in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4901. NULL Pointer Dereference in function vim_regexec_string at regexp.c:2729 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted input.
User Rank: Apprentice
9/20/2016 | 8:57:32 PM
I see two problems at play here:
CISOs don't know how to measure the return on investment existing security controls are providing, hence they are not able to articulate the value
CISOs are likely not getting the best value out of some investments - not utilising all of the features; purchase was made on a whim raher than rooted in solid discussiosn around risk; etc.
To actually make a difference in the cybersecurity industry, perhaps CISOs should try changing the way they think about the problem:
Move beyond the notion of security and even regulatory compliance (PCI-DSS is good but limited). Even ISO 27001, NIST and other frmaeworks have their flaws. Also forget about the kill chain. It describes only a subset of today's attacks.
Start thinking along these lines. Every devastating impact, be it operational, physical, personal, legal, reputational, financial, or a combination of these we suffer because of cyber crime happens because:
We failed to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in our critical assets;
We failed to predict and prevent threats that took exploited those vulnerabilities;
We failed to detect and respond to the attack that manifested from a threat;
We failed to confirm and recover from a breach in a timely and coordinated fashion.
Translate this into the requirement for a shift in mindset and culture from security or compliance to a healthy dose of:
1. asset management (asset identification and classification)
2. vulnerability management (vulnerability identification and remediation)
3. threat management (threat prediction and prevention)
4. incident management (attack detection and response)
5. continuity management (breach confirmation and recovery)
6. crisis management (impact reduction, acceptance, avoidance and transfer)
I call this "cyber resilience" and, yes, it actually works to reduce the rate and cost of cybercrime.