Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-31611PUBLISHED: 2023-02-07
NVIDIA GeForce Experience contains an uncontrolled search path vulnerability in all its client installers, where an attacker with user level privileges may cause the installer to load an arbitrary DLL when the installer is launched. A successful exploit of this vulnerability could lead to escalation...
CVE-2022-42291PUBLISHED: 2023-02-07
NVIDIA GeForce Experience contains a vulnerability in the installer, where a user installing the NVIDIA GeForce Experience software may inadvertently delete data from a linked location, which may lead to data tampering. An attacker does not have explicit control over the exploitation of this vulnera...
CVE-2022-45854PUBLISHED: 2023-02-07An improper check for unusual conditions in Zyxel NWA110AX firmware verisons prior to 6.50(ABTG.0)C0, which could allow a LAN attacker to cause a temporary denial-of-service (DoS) by sending crafted VLAN frames if the MAC address of the vulnerable AP were intercepted by the attacker.
CVE-2022-38547PUBLISHED: 2023-02-07
A post-authentication command injection vulnerability in the CLI command of Zyxel ZyWALL/USG series firmware versions 4.20 through 4.72, VPN series firmware versions 4.30 through 5.32, USG FLEX series firmware versions 4.50 through 5.32, and ATP series firmware versions 4.32 through 5.32, which coul...
CVE-2022-45441PUBLISHED: 2023-02-07
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Zyxel NBG-418N v2 firmware versions prior to V1.00(AARP.13)C0, which could allow an attacker to store malicious scripts in the Logs page of the GUI on a vulnerable device. A successful XSS attack could force an authenticated user to execute the stored ma...
User Rank: Apprentice
9/20/2016 | 8:57:32 PM
I see two problems at play here:
CISOs don't know how to measure the return on investment existing security controls are providing, hence they are not able to articulate the value
CISOs are likely not getting the best value out of some investments - not utilising all of the features; purchase was made on a whim raher than rooted in solid discussiosn around risk; etc.
To actually make a difference in the cybersecurity industry, perhaps CISOs should try changing the way they think about the problem:
Move beyond the notion of security and even regulatory compliance (PCI-DSS is good but limited). Even ISO 27001, NIST and other frmaeworks have their flaws. Also forget about the kill chain. It describes only a subset of today's attacks.
Start thinking along these lines. Every devastating impact, be it operational, physical, personal, legal, reputational, financial, or a combination of these we suffer because of cyber crime happens because:
We failed to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in our critical assets;
We failed to predict and prevent threats that took exploited those vulnerabilities;
We failed to detect and respond to the attack that manifested from a threat;
We failed to confirm and recover from a breach in a timely and coordinated fashion.
Translate this into the requirement for a shift in mindset and culture from security or compliance to a healthy dose of:
1. asset management (asset identification and classification)
2. vulnerability management (vulnerability identification and remediation)
3. threat management (threat prediction and prevention)
4. incident management (attack detection and response)
5. continuity management (breach confirmation and recovery)
6. crisis management (impact reduction, acceptance, avoidance and transfer)
I call this "cyber resilience" and, yes, it actually works to reduce the rate and cost of cybercrime.