Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
KPMG Study: Breaches Up, Security Spending Down
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
7/28/2016 | 5:40:50 PM
Re: IoT at the workplace
Yes agreed. From your perspective what typcially non-work related IoT devices do you think will have the greatest impact in the work environment as they become more integrated? Or do you think it consistent across device platforms?
T Sweeney
50%
50%
T Sweeney,
User Rank: Moderator
7/28/2016 | 4:08:31 PM
Re: IoT at the workplace
Yes, the Internet of Things promises to keep things very exciting from a security perspective.

Or as a pen-tester friend of mine likes to describe it, "job security."
T Sweeney
50%
50%
T Sweeney,
User Rank: Moderator
7/28/2016 | 4:04:02 PM
Re: 20% ?
Commenter Dr.T asked: "Does this mean that 20% do not know that they are breached?"

No. It means 80 percent of respondents were honest enough to admit they had been breached. The remainder either weren't being completely forthright or feared some sort of blowback.

I don't know any infosec professionals who think their networks are invuinerable. You?
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/28/2016 | 4:02:42 PM
IoT at the workplace
 

Can not wait to see when IoT devices come to workplaces, what an exciting days it would be for security experts :--))).
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/28/2016 | 4:02:23 PM
Re: Proactivity vs Reactivity
"The best defense is a good offense"

Exactly. I agree. The only problem is that there is no budget for offense in most cases. 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/28/2016 | 4:00:56 PM
Re: Proactivity vs Reactivity
"cyber fatigue."

I hear you. This is nothing that will be going away anytime soon. Unless we figure out a way to deal with security in more manageable and proactive way such as designing the systems and applications secure in the first place, not leaving security to later stages.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/28/2016 | 3:58:01 PM
Re: Proactivity vs Reactivity
"moving away from reactive security "

That would be great, I would think it would take more time, most SMEs do not know all these things are all about until they get hit.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/28/2016 | 3:56:10 PM
20% ?
Does this mean that 20% do not know that they are breached? Most companies have been breached one way of other, it does not have to be via a professional hacker, an employee forwarding an email to their Gmail is a breach.
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
7/28/2016 | 11:03:38 AM
Re: Proactivity vs Reactivity
Precisely.  Which goes to a related point: The best defense is a good offense.

(Which isn't an endorsement of per se offensive security measures.  Just noting the need for proactivity rather than reactivity.)
T Sweeney
50%
50%
T Sweeney,
User Rank: Moderator
7/28/2016 | 10:55:37 AM
Re: Proactivity vs Reactivity
It's true, Joe... infosec professionals are done bouncing around like squirrels in a cage (most of them, anyway). There's simply too much coming at them every single minute. I think this is at least part of what Greg Bell was talking about with his phrase "cyber fatigue."
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-2509
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QTS and QuTS hero. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands in a compromised application. We have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 4.5.2.1566 Build 20210202 and later Q...
CVE-2020-36195
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
An SQL injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP NAS running Multimedia Console or the Media Streaming add-on. If exploited, the vulnerability allows remote attackers to obtain application information. QNAP has already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions of Multimedia C...
CVE-2021-29445
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
jose-node-esm-runtime is an npm package which provides a number of cryptographic functions. In versions prior to 3.11.4 the AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2 Algorithm (A128CBC-HS256, A192CBC-HS384, A256CBC-HS512) decryption would always execute both HMAC tag verification and CBC decryption, if either failed `JWEDe...
CVE-2021-29446
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
jose-node-cjs-runtime is an npm package which provides a number of cryptographic functions. In versions prior to 3.11.4 the AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2 Algorithm (A128CBC-HS256, A192CBC-HS384, A256CBC-HS512) decryption would always execute both HMAC tag verification and CBC decryption, if either failed `JWEDe...
CVE-2021-29451
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
Portofino is an open source web development framework. Portofino before version 5.2.1 did not properly verify the signature of JSON Web Tokens. This allows forging a valid JWT. The issue will be patched in the upcoming 5.2.1 release.