Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
How Jihadists Operate Online And Under The Radar: Report
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
lorraine89
50%
50%
lorraine89,
User Rank: Ninja
9/27/2016 | 9:34:19 AM
Cyber security
Though it is evident that VPN technology has been exploited by the industry by ust too many times be it by hackers themselves or jihadists. Although it may sound like what's the purpose left then, it is important for ordinary net user to not under estimate the importance of vpn technology. I have been using purevpn to secure my important files and folders and to avoid those phishy scams and hacking attempts that have marred the internet in recent tmes. 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/27/2016 | 11:28:37 AM
Better option needed
 

There will be those who will be abusing technology on hand and using it for their benefits and harming others. Not advancing technology is not a solution to these problems. Countries should find a better way to deal with the dark web. 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/27/2016 | 11:25:11 AM
Virtual private networks (VPNs)
 

Virtual private networks (VPNs) such as CyberGhost VPN are not secure. People miss-understand what VPN is. Unless it is tied to your corporate network, it is somebody else's network and could not be considered as secure for public consumption.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/27/2016 | 11:22:37 AM
Re: Operating Online
"My online activity is no one else's business "

I generally agree but there should be some constraints around it in my view, we should not be abusing the technology and harm others with it.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/27/2016 | 11:20:19 AM
Re: In my humble opinion
"the terrorists would be to have direct access to the smartphone or computer of the sender or the recipient of the messages"

Agree. Most likely they do. Whether is it Apple or other companies, they all work with the agencies as needed basis, I am just assuming, that is what makes sense. The same is true in all other countries.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
7/27/2016 | 11:16:20 AM
Dark Web
 

Enjoyed the article. Obviously Dark web is growing, this is not of the disadvantages of advanced technologies, the technology could be used for different purposes. 
biggsy
0%
100%
biggsy,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/26/2016 | 3:22:28 AM
Operating Online
My online activity is no one else's business -- neither the NSA nor GCHQ nor any of the other bad actors on the internet have any right to read or record my stuff.  A very high percentage of the internet traffic which is being read and recorded by these bad actors is the traffic of citizens and businesses engaging in lawful activities.  More ordinary people need to read this article and take similar precautions to keep their lawful activities private.
Olaf Barheine
100%
0%
Olaf Barheine,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/23/2016 | 4:06:04 AM
In my humble opinion
And the only chance of the secret services to watch the communication between the terrorists would be to have direct access to the smartphone or computer of the sender or the recipient of the messages. Therefore I do not understand why our politicians always claim more control of the telecommunication infrastructure. It makes not really sense and in my opinion it is just a sign of helplessness. That's not comforting.


News
FluBot Malware's Rapid Spread May Soon Hit US Phones
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/28/2021
Slideshows
7 Modern-Day Cybersecurity Realities
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  4/30/2021
Commentary
How to Secure Employees' Home Wi-Fi Networks
Bert Kashyap, CEO and Co-Founder at SecureW2,  4/28/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-36124
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-07
Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by XML External Entity (XXE) injection. An authenticated attacker can compromise the private keys of a JWT token and reuse them to manipulate the access tokens to access the platform as any desired user (clients and administrators).
CVE-2020-36125
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-07
Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by incorrect access control where password revalidation in sensitive operations can be bypassed remotely by an authenticated attacker through requesting the endpoint directly.
CVE-2020-36126
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-07
Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by incorrect access control that can lead to remote privilege escalation. PAXSTORE marketplace endpoints allow an authenticated user to read and write data not owned by them, including third-party users, application and payment term...
CVE-2020-36127
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-07
Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by an information disclosure vulnerability. Through the PUK signature functionality, an administrator will not have access to the current p12 certificate and password. When accessing this functionality, the administrator has the opt...
CVE-2020-36128
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-07
Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by a token spoofing vulnerability. Each payment terminal has a session token (called X-Terminal-Token) to access the marketplace. This allows the store to identify the terminal and make available the applications distributed by its ...