Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-31476PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.3.37598. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the han...
CVE-2021-31477PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GE Reason RPV311 14A03. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the firmware and filesystem of the device. The firmware and filesystem contain hard-...
CVE-2021-32690PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Helm is a tool for managing Charts (packages of pre-configured Kubernetes resources). In versions of helm prior to 3.6.1, a vulnerability exists where the username and password credentials associated with a Helm repository could be passed on to another domain referenced by that Helm repository. This...
CVE-2021-32691PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16
Apollos Apps is an open source platform for launching church-related apps. In Apollos Apps versions prior to 2.20.0, new user registrations are able to access anyone's account by only knowing their basic profile information (name, birthday, gender, etc). This includes all app functionality within th...
CVE-2021-32243PUBLISHED: 2021-06-16FOGProject v1.5.9 is affected by a File Upload RCE (Authenticated).
Latest Comment: Zero Trust doesn't have to break your budget!
The State of Cybersecurity Incident ResponseIn this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Tweet This
0 Comments
User Rank: Strategist
7/11/2016 | 8:10:04 AM
If you wish to say it is completely unethical to take that from one job to another, then you are saying you must in essence forget everything you did on the prior position?
Or is it simply enough to re-develop the same code, without copy/paste, in the new position in order to say on th ethical side?
Keeping in mind, that a large reason you were hired in the new position, is the new employer hoping you create the same 'magic' you did in the last position.
And if your value is the knowledge you develop your measure of value to other companies, with the new model of company /employee loyalty (none either way) - in which an employer can relieve you at whim: Where is the ethics of simply qualifying for the next job? If you wish to say ethically you should not take any knowledge with you, then basically, what is your worth to your next employer?
Discuss away !