Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Bots Sign Online Petition For Second EU Referendum Post-Brexit
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2016 | 11:04:29 AM
Re: "...scripts to automatically sign petition"
" ... other sites not based on set user profiles ..."

They can easily fake user profiles too. Everybody has many names and emails in the web. I know a few of my friends do that :--))
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2016 | 10:59:56 AM
Re: Not surprised
"... It also seems ridiculous to call another referendum though ..."

I agree. You can not really argue for a second one just because you did not get it. Where does it end?
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2016 | 10:58:00 AM
Re: "...scripts to automatically sign petition"
" ... Was there authentication for this site? ..."

Good question. If not, I think it can easily be done. Automating something on the web is is easy unless site uses some type of prevention technique.
Dr.T
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2016 | 10:55:45 AM
Brexit
It makes sense. If somebody thinks that online petitions are accurate, that would be crazy. Of course there will be duplicates and submissions from other unrelated places unless you check it against your country's citizens which will most likely be not legal.
Whoopty
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
6/29/2016 | 8:03:00 AM
Not surprised
I'm not surprised and unfortunately this is the reason online petitions serve such little purpose. Nobody believes the popular ones are legitimate and the sheer number of them mean most are lost in the scuffle. 

It also seems ridiculous to call another referendum though. While I was a remain voter, the idea of calling another simply because it wasn't the result you wanted is silly.
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/28/2016 | 1:26:57 PM
"...scripts to automatically sign petition"
Was there authentication for this site? What I am trying to figure out is if potential scripting of signatures is an inherent flaw of sites such as this, or have other sites not based on set user profiles have implemented methods of mitigating this possiblity.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-2867
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-17
libtiff's tiffcrop utility has a uint32_t underflow that can lead to out of bounds read and write. An attacker who supplies a crafted file to tiffcrop (likely via tricking a user to run tiffcrop on it with certain parameters) could cause a crash or in some cases, further exploitation.
CVE-2022-2868
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-17
libtiff's tiffcrop utility has a improper input validation flaw that can lead to out of bounds read and ultimately cause a crash if an attacker is able to supply a crafted file to tiffcrop.
CVE-2022-2869
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-17
libtiff's tiffcrop tool has a uint32_t underflow which leads to out of bounds read and write in the extractContigSamples8bits routine. An attacker who supplies a crafted file to tiffcrop could trigger this flaw, most likely by tricking a user into opening the crafted file with tiffcrop. Triggering t...
CVE-2022-28751
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-17
The Zoom Client for Meetings for MacOS (Standard and for IT Admin) before version 5.11.3 contains a vulnerability in the package signature validation during the update process. A local low-privileged user could exploit this vulnerability to escalate their privileges to root.
CVE-2022-28752
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-17
Zoom Rooms for Conference Rooms for Windows versions before 5.11.0 are susceptible to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. A local low-privileged malicious user could exploit this vulnerability to escalate their privileges to the SYSTEM user.