Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
SWIFT Proposes New Measures For Bolstering Its Security
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Natasha_D_G
Natasha_D_G,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/31/2016 | 2:42:06 PM
Sock draw safer than banks?
It's disturbing that we had to wait for 12 banks to be breached to make changes. As well as it's scary how easy it is to breach our banking systems. With technology we've opened a whole new world of opportunities for citizens but also for cyber criminals. The only way we can counter and mitigate threats on our banking systems and networks as a whole is to know and understand the motivations of threat actors so that we can stay ahead of them. We must stay on the offensive and I hope we rectify these flaws in our cyber security before another spate of attacks.  If not my sock draw is not looking sp bad for my pennies.
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/31/2016 | 10:44:50 AM
Re: 2FA
Yes, you are correct I misread that line. However, outside of organizations that incorporate SWIFT messages there are many that still use single factor authentication as a security measure for internet facing apps.
dritchie
dritchie,
User Rank: Strategist
5/31/2016 | 9:40:17 AM
Re: 2FA
I believe that the article says that "in addition to 2FA" they are looking at implementing additional safety protocols.  3FA anyone?
Jdamon
Jdamon,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/30/2016 | 4:12:18 PM
Re: 2FA
Thanks for this interesting point of view about these new measures
RyanSepe
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/29/2016 | 12:29:56 PM
2FA
At this point in time its astonishing that banks do not incorporate 2FA.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-2867
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-17
libtiff's tiffcrop utility has a uint32_t underflow that can lead to out of bounds read and write. An attacker who supplies a crafted file to tiffcrop (likely via tricking a user to run tiffcrop on it with certain parameters) could cause a crash or in some cases, further exploitation.
CVE-2022-2868
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-17
libtiff's tiffcrop utility has a improper input validation flaw that can lead to out of bounds read and ultimately cause a crash if an attacker is able to supply a crafted file to tiffcrop.
CVE-2022-2869
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-17
libtiff's tiffcrop tool has a uint32_t underflow which leads to out of bounds read and write in the extractContigSamples8bits routine. An attacker who supplies a crafted file to tiffcrop could trigger this flaw, most likely by tricking a user into opening the crafted file with tiffcrop. Triggering t...
CVE-2022-28751
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-17
The Zoom Client for Meetings for MacOS (Standard and for IT Admin) before version 5.11.3 contains a vulnerability in the package signature validation during the update process. A local low-privileged user could exploit this vulnerability to escalate their privileges to root.
CVE-2022-28752
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-17
Zoom Rooms for Conference Rooms for Windows versions before 5.11.0 are susceptible to a Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability. A local low-privileged malicious user could exploit this vulnerability to escalate their privileges to the SYSTEM user.