Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
LinkedIn: More Than 100 Million Member Accounts Exposed In 2012 Breach
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/24/2016 | 11:28:17 AM
Nobody cases LinkedIn hacked
For me, people did not seem to care that LinkedIn was hacked in 2012. It did not bother anybody that their resumes and connections was disposed to others. The only problem is the username password, since we all use those in other sites too. :--)))
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/24/2016 | 11:25:28 AM
Re: Persistant
Agree. I am in the same both. Not in LinkedIn but in other sites, I still user the password I defined 5 years ago :--))
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/24/2016 | 11:24:15 AM
Re: A Timing Puzzlement
That is true. Nobody actually cared that LinkedIn was hacked. 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/24/2016 | 11:23:10 AM
Re: Thanks
Yes, it is an old case that we had to remember again. It does not go away.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
5/24/2016 | 11:22:11 AM
hashed password
 

Hass in one way so there is no encryption/decryption on the hash. For me this is the most secure way to deal with the passwords but if your password is simple has can not protect you.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2016 | 9:12:39 AM
Persistant
This promotes the best practice of users changing their password on a regular basis. I would think that unaware users from 2012 would still be using their original password if there was not a forced change.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/23/2016 | 8:59:17 AM
Re: A Timing Puzzlement
Yes, I believe you are correct.
dieselnerd
50%
50%
dieselnerd,
User Rank: Strategist
5/19/2016 | 12:36:28 PM
A Timing Puzzlement
"LinkedIn is now invalidating passwords for all accounts not changed before the 2012 breach..."

Wouldn't that be not changed after the 2012 breach?

 
Fleety
50%
50%
Fleety,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/19/2016 | 9:33:51 AM
Thanks
Thanks for your post !


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Enterprise Cybersecurity Plans in a Post-Pandemic World
Download the Enterprise Cybersecurity Plans in a Post-Pandemic World report to understand how security leaders are maintaining pace with pandemic-related challenges, and where there is room for improvement.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-41392
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
static/main-preload.js in Boost Note through 0.22.0 allows remote command execution. A remote attacker may send a crafted IPC message to the exposed vulnerable ipcRenderer IPC interface, which invokes the dangerous openExternal Electron API.
CVE-2020-21547
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
Libsixel 1.8.2 contains a heap-based buffer overflow in the dither_func_fs function in tosixel.c.
CVE-2020-21548
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
Libsixel 1.8.3 contains a heap-based buffer overflow in the sixel_encode_highcolor function in tosixel.c.
CVE-2021-39218
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
Wasmtime is an open source runtime for WebAssembly & WASI. In Wasmtime from version 0.26.0 and before version 0.30.0 is affected by a memory unsoundness vulnerability. There was an invalid free and out-of-bounds read and write bug when running Wasm that uses `externref`s in Wasmtime. To trigger ...
CVE-2021-41387
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
seatd-launch in seatd 0.6.x before 0.6.2 allows privilege escalation because it uses execlp and may be installed setuid root.