Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
PCI DSS 3.2: Making the Move to MFA
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
5/12/2016 | 8:44:32 AM
Re: PCI-DSS
@theb0x: One could argue that, if a situation is handled right, where an organization suffers a very public, humiliating, and costly fall, that organization may well be the most trustworthy in the future because they will become so dedicated to making sure that the problem never happens again.

At least, until a new group of faces lines the C-suite and/or the board...
theb0x
50%
50%
theb0x,
User Rank: Ninja
5/11/2016 | 10:11:57 AM
Re: PCI-DSS
For an Enterprise not to implement MFA into their CDE would be a very poor choice. It's not just the consumers' data at risk here. It's the Enterprise's overall reputation at risk. What consumer in their right mind would want to conduct business with a company that neglects to take every measure and practice possible to protect this sensitive information? In the event of a data breach, after investigation of the incident it will be publically known that the Company somewhere failed to properly protect it. How does such a company regain confidence with their consumers to conduct business with them again? Can they really be trusted when the 'glitch' has been fixed?
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
5/9/2016 | 9:19:36 AM
PCI-DSS
On the one hand, it's kind of sad that we need PCI-DSS to tell us this and -- effectively -- make us do this (PCI-DSS compliance is required by state law in a couple of states).

On the other hand, the arrogance shown by executives (lookin' at you, former TJX CIO from about ten years ago) in declining to implement these standards has harmed consumers and harmed industry.

I'm glad to see that MFA is now required for accessing these particular data.


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Enterprise Cybersecurity Plans in a Post-Pandemic World
Download the Enterprise Cybersecurity Plans in a Post-Pandemic World report to understand how security leaders are maintaining pace with pandemic-related challenges, and where there is room for improvement.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-29763
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-16
IBM Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes Db2 Connect Server) 11.1 and 11.5 under very specific conditions, could allow a local user to keep running a procedure that could cause the system to run out of memory.and cause a denial of service. IBM X-Force ID: 202267.
CVE-2021-29825
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-16
IBM Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes Db2 Connect Server) could disclose sensitive information when using ADMIN_CMD with LOAD or BACKUP. IBM X-Force ID: 204470.
CVE-2021-29842
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-16
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0 and Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 21.0.0.9 could allow a remote user to enumerate usernames due to a difference of responses from valid and invalid login attempts. IBM X-Force ID: 205202.
CVE-2021-29752
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-16
IBM Db2 11.2 and 11.5 contains an information disclosure vulnerability, exposing remote storage credentials to privileged users under specific conditions. IBM X-Fporce ID: 201780.
CVE-2021-34798
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-16
Malformed requests may cause the server to dereference a NULL pointer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier.