Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
Healthcare Organizations Must Consider The Financial Impact Of Ransomware Attacks
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
ba956
50%
50%
ba956,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/13/2016 | 12:57:29 PM
Re: Healthcare Ransomware attacks
If we assume that a healthcare entity if offline for a calendar week, how many surgeries or other procedures were delayed, rescheduled, or transferred due to the absence of the supporting electrinic health record?

Who is liable when the patient's health is further compromised because they did not receive the proper procedure/care at the right time?  

Operating premise is that the healthcare entity pays the ransom, and gets the data back.   If the data modified and the patients health is compromised as a result of incorract/inaccurate information in their E.H.R, whos assume liability?    Who validates the integrity of the data following a recovery from the ransomware attack? 

Most hospitals have standby procedures which they fall back on during a major IT outage. Older physicians came of age in a pen & paper world and can generally switch back to paper based notes, orders, and patient records.  But younger Docs are generally clueless in this regard. They have always worked in the E.H.R and digital environment -they never had the pen & paper experience.  So thier success is dependent on regular training and drills.  

Some hospitals keep their standby procedures on the computer/network.  This makes for tough sledding when your off the network or down to minimal electrical power.  

 
Bronchae
50%
50%
Bronchae,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/8/2016 | 5:26:01 PM
Healthcare Organizations exposure to Ransomware
Very good point on Ransomware for Healthcare. I appreciate the updated true cost calculations. Your warning should be heeded or the number of real world examples will continue to increase.

 

Bronchae
LordC623
50%
50%
LordC623,
User Rank: Strategist
4/7/2016 | 5:50:59 PM
PR
You forgot to mention the public relations cost. 


Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Enterprise Cybersecurity Plans in a Post-Pandemic World
Download the Enterprise Cybersecurity Plans in a Post-Pandemic World report to understand how security leaders are maintaining pace with pandemic-related challenges, and where there is room for improvement.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-41392
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
static/main-preload.js in Boost Note through 0.22.0 allows remote command execution. A remote attacker may send a crafted IPC message to the exposed vulnerable ipcRenderer IPC interface, which invokes the dangerous openExternal Electron API.
CVE-2020-21547
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
Libsixel 1.8.2 contains a heap-based buffer overflow in the dither_func_fs function in tosixel.c.
CVE-2020-21548
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
Libsixel 1.8.3 contains a heap-based buffer overflow in the sixel_encode_highcolor function in tosixel.c.
CVE-2021-39218
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
Wasmtime is an open source runtime for WebAssembly & WASI. In Wasmtime from version 0.26.0 and before version 0.30.0 is affected by a memory unsoundness vulnerability. There was an invalid free and out-of-bounds read and write bug when running Wasm that uses `externref`s in Wasmtime. To trigger ...
CVE-2021-41387
PUBLISHED: 2021-09-17
seatd-launch in seatd 0.6.x before 0.6.2 allows privilege escalation because it uses execlp and may be installed setuid root.