Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Comments
No Place For Tor In The Secured Workplace
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
thomasfischer
50%
50%
thomasfischer,
User Rank: Author
3/20/2016 | 6:56:43 AM
Re: Factually inaccurate
Hi Adam thanks for your comment, you are technical correct any encrypted traffic leaving the user's endpoint will keep its encryption at the exit node.  The original sentence (which is now corrected) was always in reference to the TOR layer encryption. At the point of exit the traffic loses its TOR encryption thus if the user is not using any other form of encryption like HTTPS/TLS, it will be vulnerable to attack and snooping. Let's remember too that you don't necessarily control the exit node that your traffic will end up at and most users won't take the time to configure their TOR client to use specific exit nodes.

The traffic at the point of exit is vulnerable and there have been a number of studies on this from people like Dan Egerstad in 2007 and from l'École upérieure d'informatique, électronique, automatique. Which have potentially shown that the traffic is both vulnerable to capture but potentially also to de-anonymization (based on analysing the captured packets).

I think you will agree that users don't necessarily pay attention to whether or not their traffic is running over TLS. As the recent public attacks  (such as heartbleed, freak, poddle, etc) on HTTPS/SSL/TLS have demonstrated, the point of exit still potentially leaves the user's traffic vulnerable to attack. How many laymen users do you know that will recognize if their traffic is being snooped or diverted via a man-in-the-middle attack?
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
3/19/2016 | 9:23:23 AM
Re: Factually inaccurate
Thanks for the fact check, Adam. Article has been corrected, per author authorization. Tom will be responding in comments later! 
adamshostack
50%
50%
adamshostack,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/18/2016 | 3:27:17 PM
Factually inaccurate
The closing sentence of this article is factually inaccurate.  "In order to do that, the data sent by the client needs to be unencrypted" is simply untrue.  Tor allows the use of HTTPS over Tor (and even encourages it), and some organizations (Facebook) have set up Tor exit nodes to allow safe access to their systems.

 

In fact, Tor encourages use of HTTPS over Tor to address this exact issue, www.torproject.org (slash) download/download-easy.html.en#warning  Item D.


COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 4/10/2020
Zscaler to Buy Cloudneeti
Dark Reading Staff 4/9/2020
The Coronavirus & Cybersecurity: 3 Areas of Exploitation
Robert R. Ackerman Jr., Founder & Managing Director, Allegis Capital,  4/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Yes, I do have virus protection on my system, now what?
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11669
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-10
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.2 on the powerpc platform. arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S does not have save/restore functionality for PNV_POWERSAVE_AMR, PNV_POWERSAVE_UAMOR, and PNV_POWERSAVE_AMOR, aka CID-53a712bae5dd.
CVE-2020-1801
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-10
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in several smartphones. Certain function interface in the system does not sufficiently validate the caller's identity in certain share scenario, successful exploit could cause information disclosure. Affected product versions include:Mate 30 Pro vers...
CVE-2020-3952
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-10
Under certain conditions, vmdir that ships with VMware vCenter Server, as part of an embedded or external Platform Services Controller (PSC), does not correctly implement access controls.
CVE-2020-4362
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-10
IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 traditional is vulnerable to a privilege escalation vulnerability when using token-based authentication in an admin request over the SOAP connector. IBM X-Force ID: 178929.
CVE-2020-1802
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-10
There is an insufficient integrity validation vulnerability in several products. The device does not sufficiently validate the integrity of certain file in certain loading processes, successful exploit could allow the attacker to load a crafted file to the device through USB.Affected product version...