Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-2097PUBLISHED: 2022-07-05
AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the special case of "in place" enc...
CVE-2022-2309PUBLISHED: 2022-07-05
NULL Pointer Dereference allows attackers to cause a denial of service (or application crash). This only applies when lxml is used together with libxml2 2.9.10 through 2.9.14. libxml2 2.9.9 and earlier are not affected. It allows triggering crashes through forged input data, given a vulnerable code ...
CVE-2022-2306PUBLISHED: 2022-07-05Old session tokens can be used to authenticate to the application and send authenticated requests.
CVE-2022-34918PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 5.18.9. A type confusion bug in nft_set_elem_init (leading to a buffer overflow) could be used by a local attacker to escalate privileges, a different vulnerability than CVE-2022-32250. (The attacker can obtain root access, but must start with an u...
CVE-2022-34829PUBLISHED: 2022-07-04Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus before 6203 allows a denial of service (application restart) via a crafted payload to the Mobile App Deployment API.
User Rank: Author
3/20/2016 | 6:56:43 AM
The traffic at the point of exit is vulnerable and there have been a number of studies on this from people like Dan Egerstad in 2007 and from l'École upérieure d'informatique, électronique, automatique. Which have potentially shown that the traffic is both vulnerable to capture but potentially also to de-anonymization (based on analysing the captured packets).
I think you will agree that users don't necessarily pay attention to whether or not their traffic is running over TLS. As the recent public attacks (such as heartbleed, freak, poddle, etc) on HTTPS/SSL/TLS have demonstrated, the point of exit still potentially leaves the user's traffic vulnerable to attack. How many laymen users do you know that will recognize if their traffic is being snooped or diverted via a man-in-the-middle attack?